Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OCY6ZJNXN2C642XW52FHD3RNKHXN5ZCS/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "OCY6ZJNXN2C642XW52FHD3RNKHXN5ZCS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZMRGR3XMEA52BMY7G5OMET7KFSI5H5EU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc VE2DWE",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band and Eagle: an appeal for a higher level discussion",
    "date": "2006-09-09T10:22:36Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZMRGR3XMEA52BMY7G5OMET7KFSI5H5EU/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NCOEOMFHOQFFPK47EPHXSQJLXFJAEJ6V/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WQZSRGQBIP5ONPC7TNYBS7WT4JRUC34O/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 8 Sep 2006 at 1:04, Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:\n\n> Yes, this decision was based on incomplete data. It would be wonderful\n> if many of you took the challenge to make quantitative measurements of\n> the S-band RFI levels in multiple locations. Just take your S-band LNA,\n> put on a low-gain antenna and measure the difference in background noise\n> level between that antenna and a 50 ohm dummy load as accurately as you\n> can. You will get better accuracy if you can  use a wide measurement\n> bandwidth (10-100 kHz or so). Remember to disable your receiver's AGC. A\n> good spectrum analyzer would be an excellent choice to use as the\n> detector. Please feel free to send me any such measurements along with\n> notes on the equipment you used and the environment where you made the\n> tests (urban, rural, etc). My Email address is mailto:[email protected].\n\nAs we are surrounding by engineers (a necessary sickness in this new century) Joke!\nthe test Tom Clark propose is challenging. A PCR 1000 can do the job i think. If time permit this \nweek end i will try the test.\n\nThere is a lot of jokes about engineers here as when something goes wrong it is never due to their \nwork but it is in the application of their plans... The fist thing they learn is to never used the \nword error or when they fart it always smell rose. \n\nYou know i make a couple of QSO on AO-51 last week on the V/S mode with the same set up i was using \non AO-40 i remember where the noise level was in 2003 and i also remember the nature of this QRM \nPop Pop hiss swishing sound and son on. What i remark different was the poping sound, there was \nmore pops than 3 years ago! but they seems to conteract between them. (the has been perform in SSB \nnot in FM)\n\nThe antenna was pointing at the horizon but as soon as i elevated the antenna the noise drastically \nreduce to a point where i am sure AO-40 phone QSO will be possible (If he was there...)\n\nIn my town we have one 2 lane highway. In the Washington area i have on in mind the 395 the belt \nway as they called it if i'm remembered correctly. i can assume the traffic is matching accordingly \nwith the highways as the noise level in both places.\n\nIt's cute to see a lot of calculus to tell us the S band is unusable but why i try to switch in CW \nat LOS with a 2 degree elevation playing with the DSP settings in a way to make this rare one \nburied in the noise and the pop pop QRM from the cordless phone? Why i do this if the calculus told \nme i cannot hear anything?\n\nThis story happens 3 years ago and the station was a VU and this one give me my WAC satellite \nendorsement (Hope to get it soon..)\n\nI am not an engineers but an amateur radio operator read my lips here AMATEUR take out your \ndictionary and check the definition. A ham work in a QRM QRN interference world and it was what i \nexperience since 1971.\n\nWill i be able to do the same when P3E and Eagle will eventually be in space i answer yes, is the S \nband will be as noise as of today no as when i make my SSB test i scan from 2.1 to 2.7 ghz and all \nthe analog phone seems to vanish i repeat the test at a couple of time at different hours and there \nis no more analog phone around!\n\nYes my wife microwave oven still bothers me (It is my microwave oven when i used it:) but a lot of \nQRM disappear remains the frequency hoping phones but most of the traffic on satellite is often \ndone at night or in the evening where the phones are less uses.\n\nBottom line i will posted my results with Tom test.\n\n\n\n\"-\"\nThe medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe \n",
    "attachments": []
}