Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OLWWWPHPWMKLR45ZGTYJIVWCS5SG76NA/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OLWWWPHPWMKLR45ZGTYJIVWCS5SG76NA/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "OLWWWPHPWMKLR45ZGTYJIVWCS5SG76NA",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CJGY7YUT746OJTQFWPUQTK3SY3YM53GJ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ko6th_greg (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Greg D.",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: TS-2000X performance on 23cm band - ?",
    "date": "2009-04-23T06:05:24Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CJGY7YUT746OJTQFWPUQTK3SY3YM53GJ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V6NK4RVPZSTY7BRUQJ2IUPJF3BFWLY7F/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nHi Wayne,\n\nFor satellite work, 1.2 ghz receive performance is irrelevant.  It's always an uplink.  I have yet to hear anything on 1.2 ghz, other than a beacon off to the west.  The only repeater within earshot went off the air a few years ago.  But L/US is a great mode on AO-51.\n\nGreg  KO6TH\n\n\n> From: [email protected]\n> To: [email protected]\n> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:59:32 -0700\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  TS-2000X performance on 23cm band - ?\n> \n> Hi All,\n>  \n> Q1:  I have been thinking about getting a TS-2000X but I would appreciate\n> any input regarding the performance of the 1.2 ghz module.  I seem to recall\n> that Kenwood had a problem with the earlier UT-20 modules but I don't\n> remember if that was due to poor receiver performance.  I would be hard\n> pressed to find a transverter for $450 which is the current delta between\n> the TS-2000 and TS-2000X.  But, if the UT-20 can't hear then that's tossing\n> the $450 down the crapper.  (I am aware of the 436 birdie....)\n>  \n> Q2:  I see $300 discounts on the TS-2000X from several sources.  That could\n> be due to either the poor economy or Kenwood clearing the inventory for the\n> TS-2000 replacement - any rumors about the replacement?\n>  \n> tnx & 73,\n>  \n> WA7NE\n>  \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n_________________________________________________________________\nRediscover Hotmail®: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry\nhttp://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Mobile2_042009",
    "attachments": []
}