Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OLXCU6COX4UOO4I3WOFXDK4E6SOHUAVK/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "OLXCU6COX4UOO4I3WOFXDK4E6SOHUAVK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/OLXCU6COX4UOO4I3WOFXDK4E6SOHUAVK/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wb5rmg (a) somenet.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Alan Sieg WB5RMG",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  LOTW &/or eQSL ?",
    "date": "2008-12-31T04:56:30Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/L43RJORQVHRGDBBCBKVV7NUIFOETIAUS/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I started using eQSL a year or so back, and have only recently seen enough\naction in my log to warrant uploading new contacts. I've been trying to\ngo back thru old logs, and get caught up on returning some QSLs...\n\nSeems what I'm hearing is that some do eQSL, some LOTW, others only paper...\nReckon is there any harm in also doing LOTW ?     How many do both ?\nI'm sure that there are some that don't do either - no great loss I guess.\n   /;^)\n-- \n  <- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->\n  <- http://www.somenet.net * http://wb5rmg.somenet.net ->\n  <- http://www.linkedin.com/in/alansieg * My 'Day Job' ->\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}