Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ONNPOCILEOSAD4VPHWBCDFYOEHOYD3XP/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ONNPOCILEOSAD4VPHWBCDFYOEHOYD3XP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/O4CBHCQWIXPB6I76ZE7HLBOT23BUM32U/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve3gyq (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "David B. Toth",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Galileo interference on L band",
    "date": "2006-09-22T16:58:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KB73KPLY2GJN3H4HFTY5STKQJEGXHB6N/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OJQ7G2IYUHKR727GGPP32POZYPZAEPCL/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 02:54 AM 9/22/2006, Bill Ress wrote:\n\n>Yes - those are admirable desires but we can't engineer for \"unknown\" future\n>events. It just bogs us down with worry that we might not make the right\n>\"guess.\" Instead, as I stated before, base decisions on the engineering\n>facts as we know them today (available technology, size, power, space,\n>resources, user needs, etc.) and let the future bring on whatever it has in\n>store for us.\n>\n>If you can make arguments that L-Band won't work because of system\n>engineering constraints or the mission objectives we have before us today -\n>I can live with that. But lets take this Galileo \"cloud\" off the decision\n>process.\n\nBill: I think one of the problems still is how to get a large enough \nL-band gain antenna on the satellite so that the ground station \nantennas don't end up being huge.\nIf I got that wrong, perhaps Bob McGwier and the team could correct \nme. If we cannot get a high gain system with reasonable beam-width \n(steerable vs. non-steerable) on the satellite, then the ground \nstation antenna might be unwieldy compared to the higher frequencies.\n\nAgain, I may have misunderstood this point, so I could easily stand corrected.\n\nDave\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}