Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OUX4HZI2NR4YWXZKYWI5BNURFOL5LAHU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "OUX4HZI2NR4YWXZKYWI5BNURFOL5LAHU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/OUX4HZI2NR4YWXZKYWI5BNURFOL5LAHU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "tjschuessler (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "e00b615eeb1940c790a22f139add6462",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e00b615eeb1940c790a22f139add6462/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92 fading",
    "date": "2018-03-28T18:32:29Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Remind me as to whether the satellite's TX and RX antennas are in the same\nplane or 90 degrees offset?  I thought the 90 degree offset was the case but\nmaybe I am wrong A 50/50 guess here.  In a 90 degree offset mode, you would\nalways have a different antenna to antenna orientation as related to the\nground station antenna orientation, if polarity on the ground antennas was\nthe same.  And since the Arrow is by design using perpendicular polarization\nbetween the two bands, you might be either in proper polarity or not,\ndepending on satellite orientation at the instant of observation.\n\nAs was pointed out by someone else, the satellite is not spinning in a\nconstant direction but flips and spins differently by illumination, so the\nfun challenge to operations.  Makes it fun.\n\nTom Schuessler, N5HYP\nEM12ms\n\n\nMessage: 1\nDate: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 21:38:51 -0500\nFrom: Stefan Wagener <mailto:[email protected]>\nTo: \"Stephen E. Belter\" <mailto:[email protected]>\nCc: Burns Fisher <mailto:[email protected]>, amsat-bb\n<mailto:[email protected]>,\n\tPaul Stoetzer <mailto:[email protected]>\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92 fading\nMessage-ID:\n\t\n<mailto:CAKu8kHDabVSxHSBAj4_C0HJqNDP6cJ=a2rzwpeg9yeipf=XTTA@mail.gmail.com>\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset=\"UTF-8\"\n\nThanks Steve,\n\nGreat point and well thought out. Now, let me ask you a question: After you\nmatched the downlink signal and position of your Arrow for maximum quieting\nand best signal, what happens when you now change the position of your arrow\nto look for best \"uplink\"? unless yo can keep the downlink position steady\nyou will not be able to check for the uplink.. as science tells me one thing\nhas to be constant for the other to be assessed...\n\nAll the best,\n\nStefan, VE4NSA\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}