Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P3JG3TOE6AKV7YWP3T3WSND744AJN62J/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P3JG3TOE6AKV7YWP3T3WSND744AJN62J/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "P3JG3TOE6AKV7YWP3T3WSND744AJN62J",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/FVVMU6KDIBRYIBRJKDVHIPGOYYDN3T5M/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "marsgal42 (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "laura halliday",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Automatic doppler tracking of DSB",
    "date": "2008-02-11T21:49:31Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FVVMU6KDIBRYIBRJKDVHIPGOYYDN3T5M/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nJames N5GUI wrote:\n\n\n> I am curious what got you to thinking about Doppler frequency tracking\n> on the BPSK signals.  Did you consider a specific approach on how? Had it\n> occurred to you that it might have application beyond BPSK or AO-16?\n\nI was thinking of a particular application, and a particular\nway of solving a particular problem. In particular (!), I was\nthinking of how I might make a very simple, generally idiot-\nproof way of receiving AO-16. No megabucks on a 736 and\na computer, which is how I was doing it at school. The\nsignal is BPSK. Use it, rather than the clunky open-loop\ntracking AMSAT usually uses. BPSK has a certain elegance,\nand I wanted a more elegant solution.\n\nOf course such things have wider applications. I'm not\ncompletely stupid...\n\nAlong with this was the notion of a phased array antenna\nthat would place its main lobe at the optimal angle for\nreceiving satellites. The amount of time the satellites\nspend directly overhead is small, while signal levels at\nthe horizon are low. Optimum is somewhere in between.\n\nLaura Halliday VE7LDH      Que les nuages soient notre\nGrid: CN89mg                           pied a terre...\nICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W     - Hospital/Shafte\n_________________________________________________________________\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}