Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P3K3QTT6QSGDBMTAZHP6CK4U62M3XA6E/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001a01c8d801$7250e450$0601a8c0@parents",
    "message_id_hash": "P3K3QTT6QSGDBMTAZHP6CK4U62M3XA6E",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CS32AKAOGCWLLP33LSRTYBP4ZXQ4JZXX/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka3hsw (a) att.net",
        "mailman_id": "afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: APRS through ISS and FD",
    "date": "2008-06-27T02:56:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FWD2CTKRKG3PSXCB7ESZXIQ6A7N2MR7O/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FTTSHMPS3O3UJRVBYGR374UZGN3OF7TF/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Unbelievable...  according to my Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged \nDictionary of the English Language, the ISS most certainly IS a satellite! \n(the only possible quibble being that it was built in orbit, rather than \nlaunched into orbit...)\n\nDid the ARRL people understand that you were asking about contacts THRU the \nISS, and not WITH the ISS?\n\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Alan P. Biddle\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"AMSAT-BB\" <[email protected]>; \"'TAPR APRS Mailing List'\" \n<[email protected]>\nSent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:06 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: APRS through ISS and FD\n\n\n> And the definite answer to the question is NO, the ISS is not a satellite,\n> so it doesn't get you the bonus.  I recall its status came up before, and \n> is\n> a bit anomalous.  I did suggest a slight modification to the Q&A on the FD\n> package next year to clarify what is not necessarily an intuitive \n> situation.\n> Well, there is GO-32 if you want to do 9600 baud, and there is certainly\n> going to be less traffic.\n>\n> Alan\n> WA4SCA\n-bb \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}