Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P4KODOR7GNC333QLNHCIIF4ELTNYP4X4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "P4KODOR7GNC333QLNHCIIF4ELTNYP4X4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/3ANIFY5HERGJ6KJGEMVXWIU5F2FIIUYQ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "8p6sm (a) anjo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Gus",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing",
    "date": "2013-06-11T01:56:40Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QQRDLVZ2SA3JM3ORVDWFSY6NFZYP5GJK/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 06/10/2013 06:24 PM, Jim Walls wrote:\n> I have not been satellite active for several years (mostly because of \n> no birds to actually talk through for more than 3 seconds at a time).\n\nDitto.\n\n>   LOTW was fairly new when I stopped operating satellite, but at that \n> time the general comment from those that were using LOTW was that \n> particularly for satellite operations, LOTW was such a pain to use, \n> and really did not support satellite ops without putting in incorrect \n> data (it did not understand our cross band operation or that there are \n> actually more than one satellite in use).  Maybe someone who is using \n> it currently can advise if works better for satellite operations now.\n\nAs far as I can figure out, all LOTW does is make it easier/faster to \napply for awards that I'm not even slightly interested in applying for, \nwhile guaranteeing that I'll never get a 'real' QSL card for the \ncontact.  While I'm not really a collector of cards, I QSL in reply 100% \n(green stamp appreciated but NOT necessary) and it IS nice to have that \nconcrete reminder of a QSO.  Whereas the only award I've ever applied \nfor is the ZRO, and you can't even do that any more.\n\n-- \n73, de Gus 8P6SM\nBarbados, the easternmost isle.\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}