Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P4Q6LKUMQCMYA2YDYGJG3F5Q45MRB3FM/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P4Q6LKUMQCMYA2YDYGJG3F5Q45MRB3FM/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "1567355594.1043211227556111193.JavaMail.root@md19.embarq.synacor.com",
    "message_id_hash": "P4Q6LKUMQCMYA2YDYGJG3F5Q45MRB3FM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/P4Q6LKUMQCMYA2YDYGJG3F5Q45MRB3FM/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n8mh (a) embarqmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Mark L. Hammond",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: thought for a neat product, anyone seen one?",
    "date": "2008-11-24T19:48:31Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Sounds like the LVB Tracker II (or III? heh), in its highest evolved configuration!  \n\nThere was a similar TAPR device planned LONG ago, but it never went into production, sadly.\n      \n73,\n\nMark N8MH\n\n------------------------------\n\nMessage: 4\nDate: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:14:38 -0800\nFrom: \"Eric Fort\" <[email protected]>\nSubject: [amsat-bb]  thought for a neat product, anyone seen one?\nTo: AMSAT-BB <[email protected]>\nMessage-ID:\n\t<[email protected]>\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\n\nI just thought of kind of a neat product for those of us that work sats.\nHas anyone seen anything similar?  I have an ft-817 which has a cat\ninterface and will operate both ssb and fm.  Has anyone seen a little box\nthat would adjust the radio frequency for both uplink and downlink while\ndisplaying azmuth and elevation data?  It seems that it would be handy to\nhave the frequency control take care of itself while providing data as to\nwhere I should point the arrow.  What do those reading this idea think of\nit?  It would seem to me to be quite useful especially for ssb.\n\nEric\nAF6EP\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}