Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P5XNTO2IQDUXLMJNKXKRJPW3B2JSZAVE/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001701c8dde7$2aa6af90$0601a8c0@parents",
    "message_id_hash": "P5XNTO2IQDUXLMJNKXKRJPW3B2JSZAVE",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LXP4CFFGL6FZCEQRIB3EAULCOUEERGE7/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka3hsw (a) att.net",
        "mailman_id": "afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: re best transceiver for sats",
    "date": "2008-07-04T15:03:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LXP4CFFGL6FZCEQRIB3EAULCOUEERGE7/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Having done satellites with separate transceivers (IC-275 and IC-475H); \nseparate transmitter, receiver, and transverters (Drake B-line twins with \nTC-2/SC-2/CC-1); and a single all-mode multi-band transceiver (910H), I \nwouldn't trade the 910 for anything!  Especially when combined with SatPC32 \nfor full doppler and rotor control...  I first used one for Field Day in \n2001 (borrowed from the local ham store), and immediately sold my B-line \nDrakes, a Yaesu FT-8100R, and a few other things to fund the purchase of my \nown!\n\n73,\n\nGeorge, KA3HSW\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Angus\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Friday, July 04, 2008 6:41 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] re best transceiver for sats\n\n\n> Hi all,\n> just wondering what you think is the best transceiver or transceivers for \n> the satellites. By this I mean to be able to TX and RX at the same time \n> (covering from 144mhz, 70cm and 23cm), was thinking possibly something \n> like the ICOM IC910 (with 23cm board added) so that USB downlink and LSB \n> uplink can be done (can the TS2000 do this also). Or is it better to have \n> 2 seperate radios altogether, and use one for the uplink and one for the \n> downlink?\n> Any thoughts or what do you think is the ultimate set up, doing quite well \n> here with very simple FT817 and old FT480R but using transverter for \n> 23cms.\n> regards\n> Gus M0IKB\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}