Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PHAYMYI2OKELMD25HHNWR2Q7JEPZ6OCW/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "PHAYMYI2OKELMD25HHNWR2Q7JEPZ6OCW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/PHAYMYI2OKELMD25HHNWR2Q7JEPZ6OCW/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "andythomasmail (a) yahoo.co.uk",
        "mailman_id": "709ebb0f15974ce9bdd1d10b52d51389",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/709ebb0f15974ce9bdd1d10b52d51389/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "andy thomas",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Moon project: why not a passive refeector?",
    "date": "2009-07-02T21:07:31Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nGuys,\n\ntaking a tip from ECHO, why not improve the EME link budget by building a structure of resonant cavities at 2m or 70cm, and above? Such a structure could be built by a metallic (reflective) polymer surface \"bubble\" or pyramid, and an automatic system to inject hardening-foam to give it rigidity. \n\nOur beams on earth would point to the structure at a target frequency and the increased reflectivity of the structure would bring EME  possible for more modest arrays.\n\nWould bring OSCAR-0 into the backyard...\n\njusta thought...\n\nandy G0SFJ\n\n\n      \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}