Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PJKCNZGWE7FZIJ3M2REE4YCSD3SHJEGW/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "PJKCNZGWE7FZIJ3M2REE4YCSD3SHJEGW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TGWA73JLFRUEVBYFPRSPAVLFDHYCNGSI/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "nate (a) natetech.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Nate Duehr",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: 2 ghz antenna question",
    "date": "2007-08-09T07:36:42Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TGWA73JLFRUEVBYFPRSPAVLFDHYCNGSI/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Many people don't realize they're running these 802.11 links above  \nthe legal EIRP limits for point-to-point (different than point-to- \nmultipoint) links.\n\nIt's not like the FCC is running over themselves to police it, but we  \nhams supposedly have more knowledge of what we're doing, and probably  \ncan hold ourselves to a higher technical standard and stay within the  \nlaw... even if they don't seem to care much these days.\n\nhttp://michwave.com/bbnetwork/faq/fcc.htm <- Aimed at people running  \nWIreless ISP's, and a decent reference without having to dig through  \nPart 15.\n\nWith the recent discussion here about 2.4 GHz \"pollution\" causing  \ndesign changes to whole transponders on the AMSAT world-wide  \nprojects, it also seems a bit like we all want our Part 97 cake and  \nthen we want to eat the Part 15 cake too.  (GRIN)\n\nJoe's setup looks like it comes in under the wire for P-t-P, but  \nChris didn't say how much power he was going to put into his antenna  \nsetup, nor the feedline type (to calculate feedline loss, since power  \nis measured at the input to the antenna for these EIRP limitations).   \nAnd it's 1:30 AM... so I probably (more than a 90% chance!?) did the  \nmath wrong.\n\nDo your own bad math, I'm perfectly bad at math without any outside  \nassistance!  (GRIN)  ;-)\n\n--\nNate Duehr, WY0X\[email protected]\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}