Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PKEJU574OTPL4JC4IFQZR5Y3WGMRMAUD/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAAJiE8OOVpi23SV8ZJmVU29oLmZ5a+3jmSsVGZOkuE6xLma5qg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "PKEJU574OTPL4JC4IFQZR5Y3WGMRMAUD",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/S4CMG622BRGDGEG5V3KRPRUNIFMAWKKB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kb2ysi (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "1ea455b723224992934ae02082411602",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/1ea455b723224992934ae02082411602/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Don KB2YSI",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Observations on tracking programs",
    "date": "2018-09-02T12:26:40Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KTJTPXJWYKMEEEVXHMDZH7KEH2UFXKZZ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XGY7D6K62ZJRITMCVWLJ5THXZKX737QN/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Make sure the keps are updated, Aldo the clock but I assume they are\nrunning on the same computer so that is unlikely to be a problem.\n\n73, Don KB2YSI\n\nOn Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 02:10 B J <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> On 9/2/18, Wendy and Terry Osborne <[email protected]> wrote:\n> > Hi Folks,\n> >\n> > I have recently been following AO-91 with a selection of tracking\n> programs\n> > and confirming\n> > the results with observations of the downlink.\n> >\n> > Using the same QTH location and Keps, I found the following:\n> > The AMSAT-NA online tracking page is pretty accurate. See:\n> > https://www.amsat.org/track/index.php\n> > Heavens-above.com is also pretty good. See:\n> https://www.heavens-above.com\n> > SatPC32, Orbitron, InstantTrack, and Quiktrak are pretty good and give\n> the\n> > same results as the “On-Line” trackers.\n> >\n> > Nova is about 5 minutes ahead.\n> > GPredict is about 5 minutes behind.\n> >\n> > Has anyone else noticed this?\n>\n> <snip>\n>\n> I've never worked AO-91, so I can't comment on that.  I run Gpredict\n> on a Linux ThinkPad and i found that it's been accurate for satellites\n> such as FO-29.\n>\n> 73s\n>\n> Bernhard VA6BMJ\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}