Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PQ5J2SM57MDZ5NXWFMLXLYXMRP5ILO2Q/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CA+gmQJREvfnmDWPYpazEXwKc+Tyj3ydfgP9iwg1yhnsgFmCfAw@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "PQ5J2SM57MDZ5NXWFMLXLYXMRP5ILO2Q",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6GPDT2QZVNF3G2BBZTYAATAGSK5QCKCU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "tucker (a) mcguireland.com",
        "mailman_id": "8d7b3d7ed9344733b5b29ecfdc6591ba",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8d7b3d7ed9344733b5b29ecfdc6591ba/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tucker McGuire",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Dupe contacts on SO-50",
    "date": "2017-04-17T16:31:39Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OBMMDDW6RN6O7QDRIC75Q5CF2RQSWNBT/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Mike,\n\nI agree completely. Your post goes into better detail and clarifies what\nexactly I meant.\n\nCheers & 73,\nTucker\nW4FS\n\nOn Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Mike Diehl <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Tucker,\n>\n> You bring up a situation that I'm all too familiar with. I'm not sure but\n> it seems to be closely coupled with FM repeater operation where stations\n> give a shout out to other stations they know. If only regular FM repeaters\n> worked 10 minutes every hour and a half then maybe ops would realize how\n> precious of a resource FM passes are.\n>\n> I also agree with the lonely pass situation. Out here on the left coast we\n> run into a lot of quiet time. Many times I'm surprised I don't have to turn\n> the bird on. On this type of pass it is perfectly acceptable to work the\n> same stations or put your call out to generate activity to help others find\n> the bird. Even some rag chewing with breaks is perfectly fine given you\n> don't loose situational awareness.\n>\n> I think the situation you're describing is where a rare grid(s) is on or a\n> demo station is on and you get a station who feels the need to call out or\n> work dupes. There are many passes where I've just listened to the magic of\n> radio in action, it has its own rewards. Making contacts is great but you\n> really have to remind yourself that everyone else is trying for the same.\n> It really is OK to have a pass go by where all you do is SWL.\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Mike Diehl\n> AI6GS\n>\n> > On Apr 16, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Tucker McGuire <[email protected]>\n> wrote:\n> >\n> > Hello space bird enthusiasts,\n> >\n> > I have noticed that certain stations on busy SO-50 passes work the same\n> > stations that they have worked on many previous passes when they are in\n> the\n> > same grid. Dupe contacts.\n> >\n> > This can prevent and has prevented other stations from trying to work new\n> > grids that happen to be on or perhaps prevented them from working a new\n> guy\n> > that hasn't been on the satellites before. On quiet passes I see no\n> issues\n> > with working the same station you've worked hundreds of times before but\n> on\n> > busy SO-50 passes it is just disruptive.\n> >\n> > Maybe I'm just a curmudgeon but that's my two cents.\n> >\n> > Cheers & 73,\n> > Tucker\n> > W4FS\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}