Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PQPWYNRYON6A4HGXMA5COOIRIB7UX7VP/
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PQPWYNRYON6A4HGXMA5COOIRIB7UX7VP/", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "PQPWYNRYON6A4HGXMA5COOIRIB7UX7VP", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JQNBDHKQ4H2ZASQWAGICSBOIGCCZEWOY/", "sender": { "address": "w6zkh (a) att.net", "mailman_id": null, "emails": null }, "sender_name": "John Neeley", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs", "date": "2011-01-22T21:12:39Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6ZUZTEL4KIFD2V3KCB4MBWNM7CDZAEBZ/", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Bruce is the best, and very timely.......appreciate all that he does in working \nas a volunteer card checker and awards manager for Amsat...\n\nJohn W6ZKH\n\n\n\n\n\n\n________________________________\nFrom: Bruce Paige <[email protected]>\nTo: Zachary Beougher <[email protected]>; John Neeley <[email protected]>; \nRick - WA4NVM <[email protected]>; Jeff Yanko <[email protected]>; \[email protected]\nSent: Sat, January 22, 2011 7:58:40 AM\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs\n\n\nno, if you take or send your cards to an arrl awards manager (i am one for vucc, \nwas and 5bwas), you do not pay anything other than a check to the arrl for the \ncost of your award plus the postage to return your cards to you (if you did not \ntake them in person). we are not allowed to accept any fee for checking cards, \nwe volunteer to do this for other hams. i became an awards manager long ago when \nthere was none in houston and i had to send my cards to san antonio. i have \nchecked many a card since then. \n\n\n73...bruce\n\n\n\n\n\n________________________________\nFrom: Zachary Beougher <[email protected]>\nTo: John Neeley <[email protected]>; Rick - WA4NVM <[email protected]>; Jeff Yanko \n<[email protected]>; [email protected]\nSent: Sat, January 22, 2011 8:38:51 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs\n\nDo you need to pay the card checker the $.20/QSO, or is that only if you \nsend them directly to ARRL??\n\nI agree with Rick - the wording is not very clear.\n\nZack\nKD8KSN\n\n-----Original Message----- \nFrom: John Neeley\nSent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:07 AM\nTo: Rick - WA4NVM ; Jeff Yanko ; [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs\n\nSounds like to me all the better to find a Card Checker in your area before\nsending anything to ARRL. Save on postage, etc. Hopefully the Card Checker\nwont want his cut too now? Sign of the times, it looks like to me...\n\nJohn W6ZKH\n#37184\n\n\n\n\n\n________________________________\nFrom: Rick - WA4NVM <[email protected]>\nTo: Jeff Yanko <[email protected]>; [email protected]\nSent: Sat, January 22, 2011 4:54:02 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs\n\n\n\nHi Jeff and the BB,\n\nI just found both applications on the ARRL website. (the old form, date\n2009,\nand the new form, date Jan. 2011) see following website:\n\nhttp://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20App%202011.pdf\n\nIt looks like instead of a flat $10 fee, they now have gone to multiple fees\nfor postage, the application and number of contacts. If I'm comprehending\nthis correctly, if you apply for additional VUCC sticker, in the US and a\nARRL\nmember, and turn in 60 cards, it would cost you the following:\n\n$1 postage, $7 application fee, and $.20 x 60 = $12 for a total of $20.00\n\nIs this correct? I welcome all replies, if not.\n\n73 all,\n\nRick WA4NVM\n\n\n> Hi all,\n>\n> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they\n> now\n> charge 20 cents per QSO. Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to\n> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?\n> Thanks in advance!\n>\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Jeff WB3JFS\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n", "attachments": [] }