Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PRQYZLHGWGXGL5BG7YKWHMWMKVNN2E7S/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PRQYZLHGWGXGL5BG7YKWHMWMKVNN2E7S/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "PRQYZLHGWGXGL5BG7YKWHMWMKVNN2E7S",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KX5IUNUJVNVB23GNAKWDOGMI27QGXW6P/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "alexc (a) phys.au.dk",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Alexandru Csete",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: LEO/cube sat for sale 8000$",
    "date": "2010-01-26T14:17:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KX5IUNUJVNVB23GNAKWDOGMI27QGXW6P/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Quoting William Leijenaar <[email protected]>:\n> Hi AMSATs,\n>\n> I just read the message about the tube-sats.\n> I was having a look to their options, but when I understand well in  \n> the structure there is already a radio integrated ?\n\nHi William,\n\nYou can get a tubesat both with or without electronics/radio. I think  \nyou can even use your own structure as long as it fits into the  \nenvelope specs.\n\n> What is the area that can be used for electronics ?\n> The weight is max. 250 grams, which is no problem to handle one off  \n> my LE005-R2 linear transponders (weights only 30 grams).\n> Check it on: www.leijenaarelectronics.nl\n\nMax OD = 8.94 cm (3.52 in), ID= 8.56 cm (3.37 in), Length = 12.7 cm (5.0 in)\nSo it is slightly smaller than a cubesat in one dimension, but longer  \nin length.\nYou can get the full specs on their website:\nhttp://www.interorbital.com/TubeSat_1.htm\nThere is a PDF/word file\n\n>\n> When there is enough space in the tube-sat to fit my transponder,  \n> this is very interresting.\n> Just fill the existing space with Li-ion batts and there you go...\n\nIndeed!\n\n\n> Anyone already have experience with these tube-sats ?\n\nI do not have any practical experience with them, but I know they have  \nbeen working on their launcher for many years. If I had 8000$ I would  \nbuy a tubesat.\nOf course, since their launcher does not have any track record, it  \nshould be considered as high risk. But who cares? I mean if you  \ncompare it to the price of a cubesat launch today, which is how much?  \n80000$?\n\n73\nAlex OZ9AEC\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}