Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PUM7K6HXAS6O6U7NEGAMJZMCCVO4R5RD/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "PUM7K6HXAS6O6U7NEGAMJZMCCVO4R5RD",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CCIK5DOORS3ZDQXLEMUWDRTF6AUTVBLN/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "s.wilson (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Scott Wilson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Crossed or not crossed is the question",
    "date": "2007-09-17T19:20:34Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CCIK5DOORS3ZDQXLEMUWDRTF6AUTVBLN/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "> My question to you guy is, that after i bought this one, I thought \n> that it would be hard to operate in full duplex mode as i almost \n> get cross talk on the 70cm side. \n\nPolarization is not the only thing to consider. There's also wattage, \nfeedline arrangement, and receiver quality. \n\nI'm using a Cushcraft which has the 70cm alongside the 2m elements. For\nFM, I'm running 75 watts xmit on 2m. With the default feedline which\nconsisted of two 3foot segments teed to a length of RG-58, I was getting a\nlot of desense on transmit. I changed to seperated feeds of higher quality\ncoax, and now am running full duplex just fine.\n\nI haven't been able to run full duplex on AO-7 yet though. That setup\nconsists of the same antenna plus an FT-817 for rx and transmitting SSB at\n5-35 watts from an IC7000. I get crosstalk in the FT-817 even at 5 watts\nxmit from the IC-7000.\n\nScott\nNW2S\n",
    "attachments": []
}