Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PVHMUQ356L3Q5QAZDPHEQ55C7A4EPIF2/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "000401c6d513$24799300$6532a8c0@notepad8",
    "message_id_hash": "PVHMUQ356L3Q5QAZDPHEQ55C7A4EPIF2",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/V5WDPF4VXTYGDUDOYX2LQ5FBM5AK6ONM/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "howard (a) howardlong.com",
        "mailman_id": "82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Howard Long",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: SDX transponder timing delay measurements?",
    "date": "2006-09-10T19:56:01Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V5WDPF4VXTYGDUDOYX2LQ5FBM5AK6ONM/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello Douglas\n\n> I know the design isn't even done yet, but has anyone \n> ever measured the time delay of an RF signal *through* \n> the (demo) version of SDX?\n\nI think I can answer that. The buffering and the algorithm introduces a\n32.5ms latency for a 100kHz passband.\n\nThe PC port is nasty because of Windows' buffering (I only use the Windows\nMedia API, not the lower latency options), so the latency on a PC platform\nis more like 1/3 sec.\n\nThe embedded hardware takes 32.5ms from antenna to antenna, i.e. it is not\nnoticeable.\n\n73 Howard G6LVB\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}