Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q3Q25TVQSRQ5RYGDEEQQS54RTNG7VRMJ/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q3Q25TVQSRQ5RYGDEEQQS54RTNG7VRMJ/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "Q3Q25TVQSRQ5RYGDEEQQS54RTNG7VRMJ", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/FXSFWBLIVWGZUYYQMHPMDEDSJ32LRTJH/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "ronoverdrive (a) tehfurry.com", "mailman_id": "813484ce2b5442148f5f100f58809600", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/813484ce2b5442148f5f100f58809600/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Ron Overdrive", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51", "date": "2010-05-04T19:09:14Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6FKKDK5GXTGWXTLGQSWDQUSI4CKKOAXP/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Agreed. Sure your arm gets tired after a long pass from satellites like\nHO-68, but half the fun is the simplicity and the other half being the\nchallenge. I doubt I would personally get involved with L/U on LEO's like\nAO-51 because of the cost and complexity of having computer controlled\nservos to track them just for a 10 - 20 minute window that you only get once\nor twice a day depending on the LEO. Considering I work satellites mostly on\nweekends the amount of use it would get wouldn't be worth it for me. I'd be\nmore likely to build a setup for working HEO's like AO-40 before building a\nsetup for L/U work on LEO's due to the simplicity, larger foot print, and\nlonger predictable window.\n\nTo be honest I would use FM on AO-51 as that is the most likely usage new\ncomers to satellites will most likely end up using. If you want to\ndemonstrate the raw rag chewing potential of satellites then demo a HEO like\nAO-40.\n\n~73, KC2WQW\n\nOn Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Gordon JC Pearce <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 07:20 -0500, Alan P. Biddle wrote:\n> > Peter,\n> >\n> > >From past studies, mode L/U is the place to be if you want to work\n> someone\n> > on AO-51 without an EME station. ;) While the V/U FM repeater was\n> choked\n> > on every pass, there were very few stations on L/U. In the four passes I\n> > monitored last year, totaling 46 minutes, there were only 21 station\n> heard.\n> > Half of those were on the first pass, and by the last pass on Sunday,\n> only\n> > one plaintive station calling.\n> >\n> > Alan\n> > WA4SCA\n>\n> Presumably that's because very few people have L- and S-band equipment.\n> I'm guessing that many people are - like me - put off by the prohibitive\n> cost and requirement for overcomplicated tracking systems.\n>\n> Working V/U with a handheld antenna is much more fun than sitting\n> watching a computer twiddle servos and tune the radio for you.\n>\n> Gordon MM0YEQ\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n", "attachments": [] }