Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q4SWLKGY6RXUYJ4FUTVZGNL5ONILPM7H/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "05c401c8ca86$016c43c0$1600a8c0@WIRES",
    "message_id_hash": "Q4SWLKGY6RXUYJ4FUTVZGNL5ONILPM7H",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/V7RGAVHNQMCS6MZXXX5MTMGU7DOGNQAE/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "7m3tjz (a) jk1zrw.ampr.org",
        "mailman_id": "08674ba551cb4065b7163ee771636af3",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/08674ba551cb4065b7163ee771636af3/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Satoshi Yasuda",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: D-STAR experiment on Cubesat",
    "date": "2008-06-09T23:10:25Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SQ6AX5D6AYR37KZ4LZKOS7UQHDPARWBW/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi All,\n\n> It is my understanding that it is simple a relabeled Icom radio.  If\n> it really weren't an issue for other manufacturers, one might\n> reasonably ask why we aren't seeing D-Star radios from other\n> manufacturers.  Granted, there could be other reasons, but something\n> is apparently keeping other manufacturers from building these radios.\n> This means that essentially we are in a single source situation, where\n> we can expect D-Star to remain fairly expensive.   Indeed, the codec\n> chip costs $20, but we see the price differential for these radios to\n> be well over $100, even on an HT which is fairly expensive to begin\n> with.  That's a pretty high markup.  (IC-91AD is $524, IC-91A is $408\n> at universal radio).  The UT-118 to do an upgrade is $189.   The DV-\n> Dongle is $200.\n\n D-STAR radio needs not only the AMBE codec chip but also linear codec, GMSK\nmodem chip and control cpu. (see\nhttp://d-star.dyndns.org/IC-2200H/IC-2200H052.jpg UT-115 is same as UT-118.)\nSo, I think D-STAR rig is over $100 higher than normal analog rig, (Analog\npart of D-STAR rig is same as normal analog rig.)\n\nSatoshi Yasuda 7m3tjz/ad6gz \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}