Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q4TVBF2EO4MCK7AFR2PDNI5DBMXS4RZ7/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q4TVBF2EO4MCK7AFR2PDNI5DBMXS4RZ7/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "Q4TVBF2EO4MCK7AFR2PDNI5DBMXS4RZ7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WAHPQ47CIBS2FRZ6OISN46PK52WLWDSV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve9qrp (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VHF UHF Rig",
    "date": "2008-07-24T23:00:46Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WAHPQ47CIBS2FRZ6OISN46PK52WLWDSV/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4HJL3VSTJSH3TBVMU464XRTS4YXRBL4F/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Mike Miller <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Thinking about selling 847.....Which rig is best for satellite..work.?\n>\n> ICOM 910 H\n> Kenwood 2000\n>\n> opinions ....your 2 cents\n\nI own a TS-2000. The birdie problem on SO-50 and AO-27 is quite real,\nand there is no fix I know of. I find that the birdie is so bad that\neven if I use a different receiver on UHF, I pick up the birdie on it\nas well! So it is a worse radio regarding satellite work than the ICOM\nif you care to work these birds.  However, if you consider the fact\nthat a fine HF radio is thrown in at no extra cost, that there is\ncontinuously adjustable filtering also at no cost, you might prefer\nthat trade-off. I'm reasonably pleased with mine.\n\nHowever, if money were no issue, I would get the ICOM for satellite\nwork and a different HF radio with even better characteristics.\n\nHTH,\n\n73, Bruce\nVE9QRP\n",
    "attachments": []
}