Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q54RIU6HUT2BXBTNSPPGIC7JRZZ2EW6S/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q54RIU6HUT2BXBTNSPPGIC7JRZZ2EW6S/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "Q54RIU6HUT2BXBTNSPPGIC7JRZZ2EW6S", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2YHWARXTZS7IBKPVRMFHQKD6Y7EZA5JQ/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "myles.landstein (a) gmail.com", "mailman_id": "cb9b30d952874ae18d5acc7eda29ec0e", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/cb9b30d952874ae18d5acc7eda29ec0e/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "myles landstein", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: New Kenwood HT for 2010?", "date": "2009-10-21T20:54:27Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SRWG2I6JSSZ6CKWJMCHYSTDDOWAZLOKK/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Hi\n\nIf you want to see it near the end of the video\n\nhttp://picasaweb.google.co.jp/ja7ude/KenwoodBoothAtTokyoHamFair2009#5372938884729290930\n\n\nIf i had to guess, it's prob the least amount of effort to make it \nROHS compliant, and maybe tweak a few things that wouldn't run \nup the $$\n\ndrawing heavy on the D7 vs a redesign\n\n\n\n\nLooks nice very similar to it's successor\n\n\n\nOn Oct 21, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote:\n\n> Clint,\n>\n>> Personally, I would be surprised if Kenwood dedicated a lot of\n>> engineering talent to a new, true full-duplex amateur handheld. The\n>> profit for them is not in the amateur world - but in the land \n>> mobile /\n>> commercial arenas.\n>>\n>> I hope I am wrong, though!\n>\n> At Dayton 5 months ago, Kenwood had posters in their booth\n> announcing a new HT and HF transceiver for the summer of\n> 2010. Of course, there were no details released at that time\n> for either radio.\n>\n> If Kenwood is simply updating the design of the old TH-D7 to\n> be this new HT, that might be their way to minimize R&D costs.\n> If they are able to replace the component(s) no longer in\n> production with others, they may not make many other updates\n> in the interests of saving money. The radio was still popular until\n> it was discontinued, and remains popular on the used market now.\n> I picked one up at a hamfest 3 months ago, and still need to make\n> time to play around with it.\n>\n> When the TM-D710 and TM-V71 mobile radios were released,\n> Kenwood only developed one radio \"box\" for both of these models.\n> They share the same FCC ID number, and the RC-D710 adds the\n> TNC functionality to the TM-V71 (the RC-D710 does not attach to\n> the TM-V71, unfortunately). Kenwood may be trying to stay in the\n> amateur market, without spending lots of money to do so. It will\n> be interesting to see what this new HT looks like, whenever it sees\n> the light of day (or when someone puts photos of it online).\n>\n> 73!\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\nMyles Landstein\[email protected]\nplease note my new email address\ndti will soon be eliminated , gmail is my new home update your dir\n\n", "attachments": [] }