Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q5QXI3UABCYGZMZV6N6F66XEOA2FIRJP/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "Q5QXI3UABCYGZMZV6N6F66XEOA2FIRJP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZKPBAFTSAMPMXAI3HD3E52MVTYDPQFWB/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n3tl (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Tim - N3TL",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question",
    "date": "2010-06-01T12:40:31Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TIPHOAS6LJXAWSDH6PJ4JWJAKJ5QATEM/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7MQZEYJYKBROQU6ZS6U7SBFB4VDKJA3V/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Greg,\n\nThanks for this reply. It's nice to know that even the highest of currently-in-use satellite frequencies are do-able without computer aid. I'm pleased to hear that, and will rethink my position on things above 70 cm.\n\nTo Joe and Bruce - Here, I have noticed particular challenges with VO-52, whose Doppler tends to move more quickly near mid-pass than the computer and software routinely seem able to keep up with. The Mode J satellites and AO-7 Mode B haven't really been too troublesome. At the end of the day, however, tuning manually remains a very viable option for any of us, in my opinion. \n\n73 to all,\n\nTim - N3TL\n\n\n________________________________\nFrom: Greg D. <[email protected]>\nTo: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]\nSent: Tue, June 1, 2010 12:36:55 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question\n\n\n\n\n> From: [email protected]\n> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]\n> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:42:09 -0400\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question\n> \n\n> \n> Alan, I have no doubt that you're right about the necessity for Doppler\n> control above Mode B satellites. Having always preferred the KISS approach\n> whenever possible, I suppose that's why I haven't been able to get myself\n> very excited for L- and S-band opportunities. I definitely enjoy the\n> benefits of computer control for Doppler. I just don't much care for having\n> no choice in using it (or not) to effectively work a satellite.\n> \n> 73 to all,\n> \n> Tim - N3TL\n> \n>  \n\nActually, I've been running 2.4 ghz manually since AO-40, and really haven't had that much trouble.  Just keep spinning the dial.  Also, having an older rig (736r), I don't bother with computer control when on the linear birds.  I do relax under full computer control for FM up through L-band, but there's still something satisfying about manual tuning.\n\nGreg  KO6TH\n\n\n                          \n_________________________________________________________________\nHotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.\nhttp://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}