GET

Email Detail

Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QAXOM3VIB3LJA4HYKRDBRA6G325MFNNQ/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QAXOM3VIB3LJA4HYKRDBRA6G325MFNNQ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "QAXOM3VIB3LJA4HYKRDBRA6G325MFNNQ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QAXOM3VIB3LJA4HYKRDBRA6G325MFNNQ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w5did (a) mac.com",
        "mailman_id": "8518ca733a7241c79decfc3bd8568106",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8518ca733a7241c79decfc3bd8568106/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Louis McFadin",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 142",
    "date": "2011-03-06T21:56:39Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Try an AEA VIA Echo. A lot more than the MFJ but worth it. \n\nSent from my iPhone\n\nOn Mar 6, 2011, at 15:00, [email protected] wrote:\n\n> Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to\n>    [email protected]\n> \n> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit\n>    http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to\n>    [email protected]\n> \n> You can reach the person managing the list at\n>    [email protected]\n> \n> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific\n> than \"Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest...\"\n> \n> \n> Today's Topics:\n> \n>   1. Re: AO-51 and L/U PacSat BBS Mode (Mark L. Hammond)\n>   2. Re: Antenna Analyzer (Pete Rowe)\n>   3.  AO7 on Mode A (John Geiger)\n>   4.  SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation (Marc Tessier - VE3TES)\n>   5. Re: Antenna Analyzer (i8cvs)\n>   6. Re: Antenna Analyzer (Art McBride)\n>   7. Re: Antenna Analyzer (Pete Rowe)\n>   8. Re: SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation (Alan P. Biddle)\n>   9. Re: SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation (Greg D.)\n> \n> \n> ----------------------------------------------------------------------\n> \n> Message: 1\n> Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:08:14 -0500\n> From: \"Mark L. Hammond\" <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 and L/U PacSat BBS Mode\n> To: \"Bob Bruninga\" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,\n>    \"'Vincenzo Mone'\" <[email protected]>, \"'Amsat - BBs'\"\n>    <[email protected]>\n> Message-ID: <[email protected]>\n> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"us-ascii\"\n> \n> You can guess my answer...\n> \n> Yes :)\n> \n> We make every attempt to keep the digipeater ON when the BBS is on.  In fact, I think the default from a full reload of the satellite is DIGI ON.\n> \n> \n> 73,\n> \n> Mark N8MH\n> \n> At 09:30 AM 3/6/2011 -0500, Bob Bruninga wrote:\n>> You can guess my question...\n>> Is UI digipeat enabled?\n>> \n>>> It is definitely harder to access on the L uplink \n>>> than on the rarely used V uplink, but it does work.\n>> \n>> Bob, WB4APR\n>> \n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> \n> \n> ------------------------------\n> \n> Message: 2\n> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 07:45:06 -0800 (PST)\n> From: Pete Rowe <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> To: AMSAT BB <[email protected]>, Howard Kowall <[email protected]>\n> Message-ID: <[email protected]>\n> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n> \n> Hi Howard\n> I wouldn't be without my MFJ-269 analyzer.? It is very accurate and a handy size.? Highly recommended. (no, I don't own stock in MFJ)\n> One word of caution: mine (and maybe there is something wrong with mine) draws some power from the batteries with the power switch OFF. So I take one of the batteries out when not in use.\n> \n> 73,\n> Pete\n> WA6WOA\n> \n> --- On Sun, 3/6/11, Howard Kowall <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> From: Howard Kowall <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  Antenna Analyzer\n> To: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>\n> Date: Sunday, March 6, 2011, 6:16 AM\n> \n> Hello to everyone\n> I am seriously thinking about buying an antenna analyzer,I build enough antennas to justify buying one.I enjoy building HF,VHF,UHF antennas of all flavors.The standard swr bridge is just not cutting it anymore.So I guess what I am looking for is one that will do 3mhz to 500mhz,nice to have computer interface but not a priority.I have seen a few on the internet but its nice to get some user input,rather then the sales pitches.\n> Thanks to all who read and reply in advance\n> Howard\n> VE4ISP\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> \n> \n> \n> \n> ------------------------------\n> \n> Message: 3\n> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 16:09:50 -0000\n> From: \"John Geiger\" <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  AO7 on Mode A\n> To: \"Amsat-Bb@Amsat. Org\" <[email protected]>\n> Message-ID: <0F53FE515CD94CF4B09A0FBA80DCE95D@acer61a4596bd3>\n> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=\"iso-8859-1\"\n> \n> Has there been much activity on Mode A recently?\n> \n> 73s John AA5JG\n> \n> ------------------------------\n> \n> Message: 4\n> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:21:24 -0500\n> From: \"Marc Tessier - VE3TES\" <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation\n> To: <[email protected]>\n> Message-ID: <76D433D9E1B9470F923E1374E863F790@ve3tespag9ezp9>\n> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=\"iso-8859-1\"\n> \n> Hello group, after finally getting my SSB part of the station fully operational, I then moved on to getting my packet operations up and running , and with great success, one wee  problem, I have noticed this when tracking the ISS, I am able to still digipeat off the station even long after it is supposed to be beyond the horizon according to my Satpc32 ISS software. My keps are up to date via the Satpc32 software, is there a error due to the large amount of mass now docked on the ISS? or have the keps not be uploaded in a timely fashion to the server I get my keps from?...\n> \n> Run down of my operation conditions here are as follows...\n> \n> Radio  - Kenwood TS2000\n> Software SATPC32 + Satpc32 ISS\n> PC - Dell P4 2.4Ghz CPU with internet connection\n> \n> Is there another method of getting my keps to show more accurate tracking of this big bird?...\n> \n> Regards,\n> \n> Marc Tessier - VE3TES\n> [email protected]\n> Grid FN25pa\n> \n> \n> \n> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5930 (20110306) __________\n> \n> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n> \n> http://www.eset.com\n> \n> \n> \n> ------------------------------\n> \n> Message: 5\n> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 18:40:56 +0100\n> From: \"i8cvs\" <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> To: \"Pete Rowe\" <[email protected]>, \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>,\n>    \"Howard Kowall\" <[email protected]>\n> Message-ID: <000001cbdc25$e41875a0$0401a8c0@b3o7f1>\n> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=\"iso-8859-1\"\n> \n> Hi Pete, WA6WOA\n> \n> I do not recommend the MFJ-269 antenna analyser because it is very\n> inaccurate particularly on 435 MHz\n> I have compared the MFJ-269 with several professional network analysers and\n> I have found that at most the MFJ is usable up to 30 MHz maximum because\n> above 30 MHz the inaccuracy on the real part and the imaginary part of the\n> impedance reading becomes absolutely unacceptable.\n> \n> My MFJ-269 was purchased as new but connecting to it a professional\n> 50 ohm termination good up to 12 GHz the VSWR shown at 435 MHz\n> was 1.1\n> \n> I have sent back my MFJ to the factory for inspecting  and calibration but I\n> belive that the above instrument was a very bad affair for me and will be a\n> bad affair for all that intend to use the analyser above 30 MHz.\n> \n> Be happy with your MFJ-269 even if  dreaming while sleeping I am sure that\n> my message made you suspect a wrong real part and a wrong imaginary part\n> on your impedance reading !\n> \n> Best 73\" de\n> \n> i8CVS Domenico\n> \n> ----- Original Message -----\n> From: \"Pete Rowe\" <[email protected]>\n> To: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>; \"Howard Kowall\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 4:45 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> \n> \n> Hi Howard\n> I wouldn't be without my MFJ-269 analyzer. It is very accurate and a handy\n> size. Highly recommended. (no, I don't own stock in MFJ)\n> One word of caution: mine (and maybe there is something wrong with mine)\n> draws some power from the batteries with the power switch OFF. So I take one\n> of the batteries out when not in use.\n> \n> 73,\n> Pete\n> WA6WOA\n> \n> --- On Sun, 3/6/11, Howard Kowall <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> From: Howard Kowall <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  Antenna Analyzer\n> To: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>\n> Date: Sunday, March 6, 2011, 6:16 AM\n> \n> Hello to everyone\n> I am seriously thinking about buying an antenna analyzer,I build enough\n> antennas to justify buying one.I enjoy building HF,VHF,UHF antennas of all\n> flavors.The standard swr bridge is just not cutting it anymore.So I guess\n> what I am looking for is one that will do 3mhz to 500mhz,nice to have\n> computer interface but not a priority.I have seen a few on the internet but\n> its nice to get some user input,rather then the sales pitches.\n> Thanks to all who read and reply in advance\n> Howard\n> VE4ISP\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> \n> \n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> \n> \n> ------------------------------\n> \n> Message: 6\n> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 10:38:32 -0800\n> From: \"Art McBride\" <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> To: \"'i8cvs'\" <[email protected]>, \"'Pete Rowe'\"\n>    <[email protected]>,    \"'AMSAT BB'\" <[email protected]>, \"'Howard\n>    Kowall'\" <[email protected]>\n> Message-ID: <D4644327646E4B25BA81B47CB6463BDB@KC6UQH>\n> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=\"us-ascii\"\n> \n> Domenico,\n> \n> For most Amateur Radio work a VSWR of 1.5:1 is adequate. I personally have\n> never expected MFJ products to be in the League of Anristu, HP and Rohde and\n> Swartz. \n> MFJ is a yard stick, the others are a micrometers\n> Art,\n> KC6UQH\n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n> Behalf Of i8cvs\n> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 9:41 AM\n> To: Pete Rowe; AMSAT BB; Howard Kowall\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> \n> Hi Pete, WA6WOA\n> \n> I do not recommend the MFJ-269 antenna analyser because it is very\n> inaccurate particularly on 435 MHz\n> I have compared the MFJ-269 with several professional network analysers and\n> I have found that at most the MFJ is usable up to 30 MHz maximum because\n> above 30 MHz the inaccuracy on the real part and the imaginary part of the\n> impedance reading becomes absolutely unacceptable.\n> \n> My MFJ-269 was purchased as new but connecting to it a professional\n> 50 ohm termination good up to 12 GHz the VSWR shown at 435 MHz\n> was 1.1\n> \n> I have sent back my MFJ to the factory for inspecting  and calibration but I\n> belive that the above instrument was a very bad affair for me and will be a\n> bad affair for all that intend to use the analyser above 30 MHz.\n> \n> Be happy with your MFJ-269 even if  dreaming while sleeping I am sure that\n> my message made you suspect a wrong real part and a wrong imaginary part\n> on your impedance reading !\n> \n> Best 73\" de\n> \n> i8CVS Domenico\n> \n> ----- Original Message -----\n> From: \"Pete Rowe\" <[email protected]>\n> To: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>; \"Howard Kowall\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 4:45 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> \n> \n> Hi Howard\n> I wouldn't be without my MFJ-269 analyzer. It is very accurate and a handy\n> size. Highly recommended. (no, I don't own stock in MFJ)\n> One word of caution: mine (and maybe there is something wrong with mine)\n> draws some power from the batteries with the power switch OFF. So I take one\n> of the batteries out when not in use.\n> \n> 73,\n> Pete\n> WA6WOA\n> \n> --- On Sun, 3/6/11, Howard Kowall <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> From: Howard Kowall <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  Antenna Analyzer\n> To: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>\n> Date: Sunday, March 6, 2011, 6:16 AM\n> \n> Hello to everyone\n> I am seriously thinking about buying an antenna analyzer,I build enough\n> antennas to justify buying one.I enjoy building HF,VHF,UHF antennas of all\n> flavors.The standard swr bridge is just not cutting it anymore.So I guess\n> what I am looking for is one that will do 3mhz to 500mhz,nice to have\n> computer interface but not a priority.I have seen a few on the internet but\n> its nice to get some user input,rather then the sales pitches.\n> Thanks to all who read and reply in advance\n> Howard\n> VE4ISP\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> \n> \n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature\n> database 5929 (20110305) __________\n> \n> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n> \n> http://www.eset.com\n> \n> \n> \n> \n> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature\n> database 5931 (20110306) __________\n> \n> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n> \n> http://www.eset.com\n> \n> \n> \n> \n> ------------------------------\n> \n> Message: 7\n> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 10:45:27 -0800 (PST)\n> From: Pete Rowe <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> To: AMSAT BB <[email protected]>, Howard Kowall <[email protected]>,\n>    i8cvs <[email protected]>\n> Message-ID: <[email protected]>\n> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n> \n> Thanks Dominico\n> I have also compared my unit with an HP network analyzer and have found the readings to be quite acceptable for amateur work.?? Mine reads 1.0 :1 into a precision load up to 170 MHz.? Indeed, it reads 1.1:1 at UHF and that is just fine for my measurements. Rarely do I see an antenna match less than 1.1:1.\n> \n> 73,\n> Pete\n> \n> \n> --- On Sun, 3/6/11, i8cvs <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> From: i8cvs <[email protected]>\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> To: \"Pete Rowe\" <[email protected]>, \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>, \"Howard Kowall\" <[email protected]>\n> Date: Sunday, March 6, 2011, 9:40 AM\n> \n> Hi Pete, WA6WOA\n> \n> I do not recommend the MFJ-269 antenna analyser because it is very\n> inaccurate particularly on 435 MHz\n> I have compared the MFJ-269 with several professional network analysers and\n> I have found that at most the MFJ is usable up to 30 MHz maximum because\n> above 30 MHz the inaccuracy on the real part and the imaginary part of the\n> impedance reading becomes absolutely unacceptable.\n> \n> My MFJ-269 was purchased as new but connecting to it a professional\n> 50 ohm termination good up to 12 GHz the VSWR shown at 435 MHz\n> was 1.1\n> \n> I have sent back my MFJ to the factory for inspecting? and calibration but I\n> belive that the above instrument was a very bad affair for me and will be a\n> bad affair for all that intend to use the analyser above 30 MHz.\n> \n> Be happy with your MFJ-269 even if? dreaming while sleeping I am sure that\n> my message made you suspect a wrong real part and a wrong imaginary part\n> on your impedance reading !\n> \n> Best 73\" de\n> \n> i8CVS Domenico\n> \n> ----- Original Message -----\n> From: \"Pete Rowe\" <[email protected]>\n> To: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>; \"Howard Kowall\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 4:45 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Analyzer\n> \n> \n> Hi Howard\n> I wouldn't be without my MFJ-269 analyzer. It is very accurate and a handy\n> size. Highly recommended. (no, I don't own stock in MFJ)\n> One word of caution: mine (and maybe there is something wrong with mine)\n> draws some power from the batteries with the power switch OFF. So I take one\n> of the batteries out when not in use.\n> \n> 73,\n> Pete\n> WA6WOA\n> \n> --- On Sun, 3/6/11, Howard Kowall <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> From: Howard Kowall <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]? Antenna Analyzer\n> To: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>\n> Date: Sunday, March 6, 2011, 6:16 AM\n> \n> Hello to everyone\n> I am seriously thinking about buying an antenna analyzer,I build enough\n> antennas to justify buying one.I enjoy building HF,VHF,UHF antennas of all\n> flavors.The standard swr bridge is just not cutting it anymore.So I guess\n> what I am looking for is one that will do 3mhz to 50\n",
    "attachments": []
}