Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QGSQZLA3I6W2YCJL623OI2SWCU5OU7Z7/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "QGSQZLA3I6W2YCJL623OI2SWCU5OU7Z7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QGSQZLA3I6W2YCJL623OI2SWCU5OU7Z7/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "eagleeyedennis (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": "20e496667a8b419c8162bf75bc37cc55",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/20e496667a8b419c8162bf75bc37cc55/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dennis Griffin",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 2nd repeater operational",
    "date": "2008-05-28T19:12:39Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D3ZJMWWS43ZU7JZL7TYG2UAUC3O6WNVN/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "435.300 downlink? I thought it was 435.150.\n\nThanks for the reply. I've heard ISS just fine with the same setup,  \nbut I see that AO-51 is a bit over twice as high. I'll try open  \nsquelch next time and Doppler tuning on rx. I don't understand,  \nhowever, why I didn't hear myself on the nominal 435.150 at peak of  \npass, unless rx is actually 435.300. I have the W-32 set for Full  \nDuplex, so receive mute wasn't active.\n\n73 de Dennis KD7CAC\n\n\n\nOn May 28, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:\n\n> You should try to listen with the squelch off, the satellite signal  \n> is usually not strong enough to crack it. It also might be that  \n> there was no one on during that pass. Could you hear anything on  \n> the 435.300 downlink?\n>\n> 73, Drew\n>\n> ----- Original Message ----- From: \"Dennis Griffin\"  \n> <[email protected]>\n> To: \"Andrew Glasbrenner\" <[email protected]>\n> Cc: <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:42 AM\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-51 2nd repeater operational\n>\n>\n>> Thanks, Drew. I tried it on a straight overhead pass with my IC- \n>> W32  on high power, thru an Arrow II Satellite handheld antenna,  \n>> but no  joy. The squelch did open for a few minutes during the  \n>> peak of the  pass, but I was unable to discern any audio.\n>>\n>> 73 de Dennis KD7CAC\n>> Scottsdale, AZ\n>>\n>>\n>> On May 28, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:\n>>\n>>> 145.86 is the old 2m digital uplink. 145.88 is the 2nd repeater   \n>>> voice uplink.\n>>>\n>>> 73, Drew\n>>>\n>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: \"Dennis Griffin\"  \n>>> <[email protected]>\n>>> To: \"Andrew Glasbrenner\" <[email protected]>\n>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 10:48 AM\n>>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-51 2nd repeater operational\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>> MacDoppler Pro has the tx as 145.860. Can you confirm which it  \n>>>> is?  A good pass coming up here in my area.\n>>>>\n>>>> 73 de Dennis KD7CAC\n>>>> Scottsdale, AZ\n>>>>\n>>>>\n>>>> On May 28, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:\n>>>>\n>>>>> Just a reminder that the 2nd repeater is active on AO-51,   \n>>>>> 145.880 uplink and\n>>>>> 435.150 downlink. It is not restricted to QRP this time, but  \n>>>>> we  do ask that\n>>>>> only FM voice be used. Those that have been reluctant to use  \n>>>>> the FM\n>>>>> satellites should give it a try, there is no contention. Last   \n>>>>> night on the\n>>>>> first east coast pass, there were only 3 stations the entire pass.\n>>>>>\n>>>>> 73, Drew KO4MA\n>>>>> AMSAT VP Operations\n>>>\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}