Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QJA7VZMHAE6DX3Q4YYHNPNCPPQJPS3IB/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QJA7VZMHAE6DX3Q4YYHNPNCPPQJPS3IB/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "002101c6cbf2$f1e68b60$72b7b546@kc6uqh", "message_id_hash": "QJA7VZMHAE6DX3Q4YYHNPNCPPQJPS3IB", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/P7RT2WZYNQ3KBXXJUKETXFWNNAWNBNAU/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "kc6uqh (a) cox.net", "mailman_id": "d9201820d18047e4a2772c86bda5e111", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/d9201820d18047e4a2772c86bda5e111/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "kc6uqh", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 Minimum antenna system to work.", "date": "2006-08-30T05:12:52Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LT3ZOAFREI6Z5WNLAAT3G4XF4PS2RVVB/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Hi all,\nJust something else to try. A 1 wavelength 1 Turn QFH. best gain @ 30 \ndegrees instead of 90 where you do not need it.\n\nArt, KC6UQH\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"SV1BSX\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>; \"Amsat-BULL\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 7:22 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 Minimum antenna system to work.\n\n\nHi Joe,\n\nyes, I had tried to listen the FO-29's downlink with QFH-antennas on\nseveral arrangements and\nI noticed that the QFH is the most reliable omni Satellite-antenna.\n The downlink signal was superior in comparison with other omni-antennas.\n(My QFH was based on *excellent* articles of I8CVS & W3KH respectively,\nwith infinity baluns).\n\nThe most important point (as usual) it's the length of coaxial between QFH\nand\nReceiver. On my experiments onto my roof by using just a few feet of\ncables, the\nQFH was pretty good for FO-29 reception. The problem began when connected\nwith my long-long coaxial cable up to my shack, even in case which I used\ngood\nquality cable. It's obvious that, the QFH with long coaxial needs a preamp,\nanyhow.\nBut in this case, you need hard work in order to be able to achieve the best\nresult for good reception.\n\n However, even if QFH is the best Satellite omni-antenna, my experiments\nproved me that for Linear birds, like FO-29, the QFH is worst than any small\nUHF-Yagi (ie 5-7 El). The superiority of Yagi antenna is obvious especially\nin\nweak signals (Q5 upto 1-3 S Unit).\n On the other hand, for FM-birds the QFH is good enough and that probably\nhas to do with limiter-stages in FM-mode receivers. Just keep in mind.\n\n73, Mak SV1BSX\n\n\[email protected]\nhttp://www.qsl.net/sv1bsx\n\nLAN eMail-Server: This Email has been checked by NAV 2005\n Virus Free\n\n\n\n\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: \"Joe Leikhim\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:38 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] FO-29 Minimum antenna system to work.\n\n\nHas anyone tried working FO-29 with egg beaters or other omni\ndirectional array? I have plenty of power and a good preamp. I have yet\nto put my yagi's together (after my last move) and wonder if I can\ncobble together something that will work.\n\n--\nJoe Leikhim K4SAT\n\"The RFI-EMI-GUY\"©\n\n\"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?\nFor if it prosper, none dare call it treason.\"\n\n\"Follow The Money\" ;-P\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n\n__________________________________________________\n×ñçóéìïðïéåßôå Yahoo!;\nÂáñåèÞêáôå ôá åíï÷ëçôéêÜ ìçíýìáôá (spam); Ôï Yahoo! Mail äéáèÝôåé ôçí \nêáëýôåñç äõíáôÞ ðñïóôáóßá êáôÜ ôùí åíï÷ëçôéêþí ìçíõìÜôùí\nhttp://mail.yahoo.gr\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n\n\n", "attachments": [] }