Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QJPKMXSACT5JW42Y4K4ZOQPKBOPQL7VR/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "QJPKMXSACT5JW42Y4K4ZOQPKBOPQL7VR",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/E2X2WVZG65EQOOH4KYFUVIJLWBL7WICD/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "robert.machale (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": "46e6b85af97e4043be040e7aded959ab",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/46e6b85af97e4043be040e7aded959ab/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Robert MacHale",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs",
    "date": "2019-07-16T16:32:31Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/J36ASV62ARVDPCY7LB5O3MQK3BVYX7W6/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "You may be right.\nBob Bruninga mentioned a scenario where the ARISS path becomes PSAT, ARISS* because the satellite inserts the call sign.\n73\nRobert MacHale. KE6BLR Ham Radio License. http://spaceCommunicator.club/igates\n. Supporting Boy Scout Merit Badges in Radio, Robotics, and Space Exploration\n \n\n    On Tuesday, July 16, 2019, 8:20:01 AM PDT, Ryan Noguchi via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> wrote:  \n \n  I admit I am not very familiar with the packet format, but that feed seems to identify the satellite that digipeated (or originated) each packet. Yesterday, Christy KB6LTY and I exchanged messages on AISAT, which can be seen in that packet stream, even though I used only the path ARISS. And KE4AZZ had packets digipeated by PSAT2. What am I missing?\n\n73, Ryan AI6DO\n\n\n\n    On Monday, July 15, 2019, 1:31:37 PM PDT, KE6BLR Robert <[email protected]> wrote:  \n \n Just a thought -- one of the benefits of using the actual call sign (RS0ISS, PSAT, PSAT2) rather than ARISS or APRSAT is for the record.\nFor example, I am calculating the Az/El of each contact based on the digipeated (PSAT*) path. When the digipeated path is ARISS or APRSAT there is no good way to clarify which satellite participated in the packet.\nhttp://www.spacecommunicator.club/igates/ \n\nSee the Az/El columns for PSAT; I plan to add Az/El for others sometime soon.\n\nAs a consumer of the data, I prefer seeing the individual call sign. As the user of the radio, I can see how using APRSAT for everything is more convenient.\n73\n\n\n  \n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n  \n",
    "attachments": []
}