Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QRPOU5QW7RFSUF7YHYUA2KCFRB4PAKGO/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "QRPOU5QW7RFSUF7YHYUA2KCFRB4PAKGO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QRPOU5QW7RFSUF7YHYUA2KCFRB4PAKGO/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k6yk (a) juno.com",
        "mailman_id": "9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "John W Lee",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: CW from an FM HT",
    "date": "2006-10-28T23:06:35Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NU7KLRYQF6BQP7TVG2HCYPFKHI5DGVGM/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nA lot of the time, you don't have to QSY much on CW, \nso the step isn't all that super important. Just pick a spot and \ngive out a few CQ's.  Of course you have to have some other \nreceiver than the HT unless it receives SSB/CW.   \n\n(I used to get some  SSB/CW  QSO's on the old birds)\nCall CQ on CW and get a SSB answer or vice-versa..  Of course\nat that time most folks could copy CW. \n\n73\nJohn\n\n> \n> I was doing some testing here at home with this.  I used an IC-W32A \n> and IC-T7H\n> with a straight key plugged into the mic jack on each radio.  \n> Nothing fancy from\n> the key, just an adapter to fit the 3/32\" (2.5mm) jack, and I could \n> key the\n> transmitter.  When I did this, listening on another radio, I could\n> hear only the\n> carrier.  No audio was coming from the HTs' built-in mics.\n> \n> I might try this on FO-29 this evening, and maybe VO-52.  One \n> additional\n> drawback with an HT for a CW transmitter is the fact that most HTs\n> (including these two I tried this morning) have 5 kHz as the \n> smallest tuning\n> step.  I also have an FT-817ND, but I only have one of those \n> radios.\n> Otherwise, I would be trying all of this with a pair of FT-817s and \n> making\n> some CW and SSB contacts.\n> \n> 73!\n> \n> \n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}