Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QS2EUAKXVSLJLIVJEAYM4O2ZR7VAOKT7/
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QS2EUAKXVSLJLIVJEAYM4O2ZR7VAOKT7/", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "QS2EUAKXVSLJLIVJEAYM4O2ZR7VAOKT7", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QS2EUAKXVSLJLIVJEAYM4O2ZR7VAOKT7/", "sender": { "address": "k7zt (a) cox.net", "mailman_id": null, "emails": null }, "sender_name": "[email protected]", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E", "date": "2006-09-07T19:21:31Z", "parent": null, "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NJ43P5N5BEVXYARTIGCGEDQMSYFDDO7X/" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Ok, I ran S Band on AO-40 as well; my home, radio shack, and neighborhood are covered with 2.4Gig stuff. The ONLY interference I ever received was in the form of \nVery short burst (pops) which any noise blanker was extreamly effective at removing.\n\nThe 5Gig band will be in the same shape as S Band is today. I simply don’t buy into the \nInterference argument.\n73's DE K7ZT, Joe\n---- \"Félim Doyle M3HIM\" <[email protected]> wrote: \n> But if you were a true conspiracy theorist your message would not have made\n> it this far. Some of mine didn't - and I'm no anarchist\n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: \"David Goncalves\" <[email protected]>\n> To: <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 4:27 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E\n> \n> \n> > I love these messages; I really can't get enough of them. They really\n> > brighten my day.\n> > If Luc and AMSAT would bind these into a book, I'd buy it. I'd call it\n> \"The\n> > AMSAT Anthology of Conspiracy\".\n> >\n> > Luc, keep on doing what you are doing.\n> >\n> > Dave W1EUJ\n> >\n> > > Disappointed to find out that there will not be an S band downlink on\n> > > Eagle\n> > > >\n> > > > Will there be an S band downlink on the P3E bird???\n> > > >\n> > > > Sure hate having to fork over more money each time a new satellite\n> goes\n> > > up\n> > > > because previous up/downlinks are not being used anymore....makes me\n> > > wish\n> > > > for more mode A LEO birds (grin)\n> > > >\n> > > > 73, Joe W2KJ\n> > >\n> > > Another bad move by AMSAT-NA... I don't know if they look at their\n> famous\n> > > survey about their\n> > > members opinions here? Probably not could be some one will wake up from\n> > > lethargy at the next\n> > > symposium and voices opinions about the maintaining of mode S.\n> > >\n> > > If AMSAT-NA is building sats in close circle they just have to openly\n> > > admitted it even if admission\n> > > is not a very spoken word they can at least give some explanations on\n> > > their facts who leads them to\n> > > scrap mode S?\n> > >\n> > > Interference? even if they wants to go higher at the time eagle will be\n> in\n> > > space the higher\n> > > frequencies will be as crowded as 2.4 actually. We actually see some\n> > > decreased in 2.4 ghz apparatus\n> > > as the public always want the most recent goodies even FRS/GMRS are\n> moving\n> > > to 5.2 ghz.\n> > >\n> > > Suggestion: At the next AMSAT-NA 2006 Space Symposium it will\n> appropriate\n> > > to voices opinions to the\n> > > BOD asking them to maintain as planned the mode S.\n> > >\n> > > Just to pointed out on a 2005 AMSAT-NA Dayton Hamvention Jim Sanford\n> > > WB4GCS made a presentation on\n> > > eagle project and he said i quote \" S band will be our bread and butter\n> on\n> > > the downlink\" a\n> > > prototype of L/S and C/S where planned for the 2005 Symposium at that\n> > > time.\n> > >\n> > > He also mention that the C/C project in on a bleeding edge technology\n> > > (read experimental) and they\n> > > where not too sure if they will even be able to make it.\n> > >\n> > > Why the C/C band project? he let go this \" this will permit some folks\n> to\n> > > use it from their\n> > > balcony\" the cat goes out the bag AGAIN the same ECHO mindings are\n> > > resurecting...The guy with an HT\n> > > will be able to make it without using a huge antenna!\n> > >\n> > > We will never be able to get rid of this obsession and you know now why\n> > > they want to move up? The\n> > > guy who live on a balcony is living in an apartment complex where S band\n> > > in unusable. Here is why\n> > > the C/C project come up. How many actual sat operator are living in\n> > > apartments? the majority of\n> > > some of them?\n> > >\n> > > Here is the whole logics behind this mode S scrapping. If you read a bit\n> > > behind the lines you will\n> > > see he speak about P3E where mode S will be present and he confirm some\n> > > collaboration between both\n> > > teams. He also say some of the Eagle builders are funding their own\n> > > project. From this since 2005\n> > > we can only see the builders behind the C/C project pushing so hard to a\n> > > point to get the money\n> > > previously intended for the 2 S mode TX redirected to their C/C project.\n> > >\n> > > Who is driving AMSAT-NA an hollow BOD? an hollow president? Or a third\n> > > builders manipulating wing\n> > > who blackmail the BOD?\n> > >\n> > > None of them? I let the conclusion yours!\n> > >\n> > > P.S.To the BOD its not the best way to attract new members or convince\n> > > those who leave to rejoin!\n> > >\n> > > \"-\"\n> > > The medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n> > >\n> > > Luc Leblanc VE2DWE\n> > > Skype VE2DWE\n> > > www.qsl.net/ve2dwe\n> > > Former AMSAT-NA coordonnator and member.\n> > > _______________________________________________\n> > > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> > >\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> > -- \n> > David Goncalves\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n", "attachments": [] }