Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QSBV2AJP7WWAG32I3NJGZL4GW6ASG4A6/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAPovOwexv9Cfngo9mGCdtCuSC+bd08WZ53QVnmdUisSYXjjRLQ@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "QSBV2AJP7WWAG32I3NJGZL4GW6ASG4A6",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/FNSF5QZPFKYE7MJGYQQITENMAAYCINAN/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kayakfishtx (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Clayton Coleman",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Polarisation Switch",
    "date": "2014-12-25T16:34:03Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VJKCGXBUXBISKMMP5MZROAPY3PUBRYXQ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CSAZRW7IT5UDSRSOURCHZ7N2OHRQGIYV/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Simon,\n\nI agree with your assessment.  Using SDR on satellites is a wonderful\nthing.  I have been assessing the value of SDR on satellites for\nseveral months and my personal conclusion is that it's benefits far\noutweigh the negatives.  I'll be writing up my notes for a short\ncolumn soon.\n\nI'm quite spoiled using my FUNcube Dongle Pro+ to receive.  It does a\ngreat job, allowing me to see the entire passband of all our current\nsatellite fleet.  Not only can I visually see the passband, I am\nrecording it in both AF+RF so that I can go back and look for things I\nmight have missed during a previous satellite pass.\n\nMy biggest complaint about using the SDR setup is having to switch\ncables depending on by transmit band.  I'm looking for clean solutions\nto switch between U/V and V/U configurations, giving me the best\nisolation and protection for my SDR devices from the transmitter.\n\nSome folks don't like the short delay effect using SDR.  I find it is\nmanageable and can be \"tweaked\" for optimum performance.\n\n73\nClayton\nW5PFG\n\n\n\nOn Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Simon Brown <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Hi Wouter,\n>\n>\n>\n> Many thanks and also thanks to Ken. I’m currently sorting out the station on the FO-29 passes, mainly debugging the software.\n>\n>\n>\n> FWIW I am using a NetSDR + Down-converter (from RFspace) on RX and a TS-2000 on TX. Using the SDR on RX is so much better than flying blind IMO J . I need to get some cables ordered to I can easily switch between 2m and 70cms, when I do this I’ll start with AO-73.\n>\n>\n>\n> Simon Brown G4ELI\n> http://v2.sdr-radio.com\n",
    "attachments": []
}