Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QW5NF4CTVP6VKZYHCAPFBFHW2Q742FUL/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "030520090134.923.49AF2C0D0000E8F90000039B22218675169B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF049BCC02@att.net",
    "message_id_hash": "QW5NF4CTVP6VKZYHCAPFBFHW2Q742FUL",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/SML5SEI7BY7HRH3HLYO4FREYQP4ILDE3/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n3tl (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: No current production full-duplex HT's?",
    "date": "2009-03-05T01:34:05Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YBMSB5HWAHNFKX6PZDKJMCMHFYZTXZEA/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Howard and all,\n\nNeither the VX-7R nor the VX-8R are full-duplex capable. I own the former, and have an email from a member of Yaesu's tech support staff confirming that the new VX-8R is, like the VX-7R only semi-duplex. \n\n73,\n\nTim - N3TL\n-------------- Original message from \"Howard Kowall\" <[email protected]>: -------------- \n\n\n> Hello \n> I believe the Yaesu VX8R,VX7R are still available \n> And the VX8R Is fairly new to Yaesu's HT Line UP \n> I think they are full duplex HT's \n> Just my 2 cents \n> Howard \n> VE4ISP \n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: \"Jeff Yanko\" \n> To: ; \"Dave-K7DAA\" ; \n> \n> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:03 PM \n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: No current production full-duplex HT's? \n> \n> \n> > About April or May of last year I noticed that the full duplex HT's were \n> > disappearing from the ads except the Kenwood TH-D7(G). Then about June or \n> > early July that one started disappearing as well. I found that Ham Radio \n> > Outlet (HRO) still had them on hand and I ordered one right away. A \n> > couple \n> > months later that was no loger offered at HRO and that's pretty much the \n> > last I've seen of them. \n> > \n> > 73, \n> > \n> > Jeff WB3JFS \n> > \n> > \n> > \n> > ----- Original Message ----- \n> > From: \n> > To: \"Dave-K7DAA\" ; \n> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:19 PM \n> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: No current production full-duplex HT's? \n> > \n> > \n> >> Dave, \n> >> \n> >> There was a thread posted a few weeks ago about a new HT from Alinco, \n> >> reportedly to debut at Dayton, that will offer full-duplex operation. \n> >> \n> >> There are no current-production HTs that are full-duplex capable. \n> >> \n> >> 73, \n> >> \n> >> Tim - N3TL \n> >> -------------- Original message from Dave-K7DAA \n> >> : -------------- \n> >> \n> >> \n> >>> Folks: \n> >>> \n> >>> Sorry for the bandwidth, but I know this question comes up here \n> >>> periodically. I've looked around quite a bit, but I can't seem to \n> >>> locate any newer information about whether or not there are any \n> >>> _current_ production HT's capable of transmitting on 2 meters while \n> >>> simultaneously listening on the 437 downlink for use with the FM \n> >>> sats. As far as I can tell, that answer is \"no\", but I wanted to make \n> >>> sure that's the case before I go looking for a gently-used Icom W32A \n> >>> or similar older unit. I'm tired of the \"excitement\" of having to \n> >>> transmit in the blind when operating portable on SO-50! That got old \n> >>> the first time I tried it late one night when there was no activity on \n> >>> an overhead pass, had to try to switch on the TOT, then guess whether \n> >>> I had actually done it correctly, etc... \n> >>> \n> >>> Thanks in advance, \n> >>> \n> >>> Dave - K7DAA \n> >>> \n> >>> _______________________________________________ \n> >>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> >>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> >>> program! \n> >>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> >> _______________________________________________ \n> >> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> >> program! \n> >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> >> \n> > \n> > \n> > _______________________________________________ \n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}