Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/R6SFPOYRO7RAZEPJFF3FH5UNWKCBYVDI/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "R6SFPOYRO7RAZEPJFF3FH5UNWKCBYVDI",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NXUV3NHCZCUCI7TGRQBRNADPM3LV5V5W/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ham (a) g4dmf.co.uk",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John Wright",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: drake 2880",
    "date": "2010-02-24T08:46:54Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NXUV3NHCZCUCI7TGRQBRNADPM3LV5V5W/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 23:26 23/02/2010, you wrote:\n>Has any one used the Drake 2880 downconverter on the air.\n\nNot been on the Sats for some time, but when AO40 was alive, I used \nthe drake for the downlink.\nmy experiences are shown at -\n\nhttp://www.g4dmf.co.uk/dish/antenna.html\n\n From what I gather, AO51 is a magnitude stronger than AO40 ever was. \nThe Drake provided solid copy of Telemetry.\n\nThere are links in the article to various pictures I took, including \na screen-shot of AO40 data on screen, and links to the mod pages for \nsome of the many modifications done to that downconvertor.\n\nRIP AO40... Praying for a \" Battery Event \" on that bird too! \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}