Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RGPLBWFGHYVUV54OSQGJMR6OXCUQ4FZA/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "A2BED0514EDB4305B6947D59D11DA8DD@acer61a4596bd3",
    "message_id_hash": "RGPLBWFGHYVUV54OSQGJMR6OXCUQ4FZA",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/EGQCTG2NAWW5ELHWTMFTYOIYUSUDMJAH/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "aa5jg (a) fidmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John Geiger",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: LOTW & VUCC Discussion",
    "date": "2011-01-25T22:12:38Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EGQCTG2NAWW5ELHWTMFTYOIYUSUDMJAH/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "But that is for LOTW. For paper QSLs it is $12 annual up to 120 QSOs.\n\nFor those same 120 QSOs on VUCC it is $24, and that is even if a card \nchecker checks them and all the ARRL does is enter the data.\n\n73s John AA5JG\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"John Papay\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:08 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: LOTW & VUCC Discussion\n\n\n> The cost for \"credits\" for LOTW DXCC filings is:\n> 0-49  $.25/each\n> 50-99 $.225/each\n> 100-249 $.20/each\n> 250-499 $.175/each\n> 500- $.15/each\n>\n> LOTW for VUCC is $.16/credit no matter how many you submit.\n>\n> If you submit 100 credits for DXCC, it's $20 for the qso's.\n> If you submit 100 credits for VUCC, it's $16 for the qso's.\n>\n> These numbers are for endorsements rather than initial applications.\n>\n> The debate as to the cost of DXCC vs. VUCC using LOTW is a good\n> one.  The Directors should look at that when they validate the\n> fee schedule.\n>\n> 73, John K8YSE\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}