Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RGW2SCOJL7SNH4MPCU2EFZ22HCGLFUDV/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "RGW2SCOJL7SNH4MPCU2EFZ22HCGLFUDV",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KK5O52NXJQJGGNNDJJWLFXZPWSP6BFWP/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "godetj (a) wanadoo.fr",
        "mailman_id": "80e78f33b7e5449fbf3fe453c2bca4a8",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/80e78f33b7e5449fbf3fe453c2bca4a8/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jean-Pierre Godet",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: new sat beacon around 435.800 ?",
    "date": "2013-04-26T14:48:33Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GC4XHQP6LZ7MPIT3NRYJSLMWGA2W6QJX/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "   Many thanks Scott/N1AIA and Mika/OH8MBN,\n\n   Yes, it was FO-29... I wrote 435.910 for the beacon of FO-29 and this \nwrong frequency was leading me to mistake. The JAS-2/FO-29 beacon is very \nclose to the one of Hope-1.\n\n   Thank you again, best 73 !\n\n   J-P/F5YG\n\n-- \nPowered by Linux (Slackware 10.0 - kernel 2.4.26)\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}