Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RHCABOO7CLUOUICVFCFHXR2Z5H47AOZS/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAJtf0TkdNO1cfSvwww+AbS7k-GAHS+xA76bnnVvDHVbqpAGp7Q@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "RHCABOO7CLUOUICVFCFHXR2Z5H47AOZS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RHCABOO7CLUOUICVFCFHXR2Z5H47AOZS/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mrtoburen7 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e85b2f29794044f6bc879e2831ce6468",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e85b2f29794044f6bc879e2831ce6468/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "MrToby",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)",
    "date": "2018-06-26T02:39:22Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "James, I don't take exception with anything you have said. I would rather\noperate linear SATs anyhow.  What bothered me about FD and generally any\nday, very few if any of them are worked using CW.  CW is easier to copy and\nI think SAT exchanges during FD or otherwise would be faster and more\nefficient.\n\nIf I could wish for one thing, that would be it, everyone try making CW\ncontacts via SAT!\n\nMarshall, AA0FO (em29)\n\n>\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}