Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RJOD7UPDLE2HK2YGUXPIG4T4SUPK3MRR/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "RJOD7UPDLE2HK2YGUXPIG4T4SUPK3MRR",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ORSIUT6HVHKOEVQCCXAJBSTPXN5GFHRN/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "daniel (a) destevez.net",
        "mailman_id": "c2eac82b839b45f5a7d3b923c1721007",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/c2eac82b839b45f5a7d3b923c1721007/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dani EA4GPZ",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Why 6 digit grid locator in Europe?",
    "date": "2016-02-18T21:35:12Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RTX7LLGZPO37WJ24RLRPTZAJY5W55QO4/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V4UD6DP7Y2AYTJNSN3LMRT6AS72YUIQB/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "El 18/02/16 a las 15:26, Peter Goodhall escribió:\n\n> We can strip down exchange information to just be 2E0SQL EA1JM IO91 or\n> if we don't bother even with that 2E0SQL EA1JM.. I'm not really sure\n> it constitutes a contact by my licence regulations.\n\nI don't think that the licence regulations have any say on what\nconstitutes a contact or actually try say so. That's for the ham\ncommunity to decide. I can speak only for the Spanish and UK\nregulations, which are the ones that I've ever read.\n\nThe EME and meteor scatter communities have a very clear idea of what\nconstitutes a contact for them, because they're only always working\nunder marginal conditions, so they try to send the least information\npossible.\n\n\n> There's far greater issues like people calling over the top of in\n> progress QSOs, deliberate jamming etc which should be dealt with\n> first, if this was taken care of then more QSOs on FM satellites could\n> take place and that extra two letters wouldn't really make a real\n> difference.\n\nI agree with that. For me, the worst problem in FM satellites is people\ncalling over and over without being able to hear the satellite. It would\nbe fun to record some passes and study how much time gets wasted with\nsuch issues and how much time is used to actually make QSOs. I have the\nimpression that more than half of the time gets wasted usually.\n\n73,\n\nDani EA4GPZ.\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}