Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RM6YXQIG3OJX7EMLPPBNNH3ZMNUEITT7/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "006d01ca430a$dc8c5a00$6901a8c0@peter",
    "message_id_hash": "RM6YXQIG3OJX7EMLPPBNNH3ZMNUEITT7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RM6YXQIG3OJX7EMLPPBNNH3ZMNUEITT7/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "roi (a) optonline.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Peter",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Arrow 11 Antenna performance from the designer",
    "date": "2009-10-02T02:48:00Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello,\n\nI've been reading the comments on the Arrow 11 Antenna regarding performance\ncomparisons with the stock vs. commercial Duplexer's.  I decided to find the\ndesigner and ask him, while not the scientific answer I was seeking it does\ngive us some idea of what he was asked to design.\n\n73,\nPete, WB2OQQ\n\n\nPete;\n    Well, 2.4 db of loss sounds like one that is a little high, but possible\nif you include the cables.  I did this design over 10 years ago, and I hold\nno stake in Arrow or Duplexer production.  I used surface mount components\nthat made it so that it would fit in the handle.  The losses form those are\nnot as good a tuned up commercial duplexer with better Q's for the\ninductors.  As with any project some one's idea is always better than the\nrest.  I take it with a grain of salt, this was a fun project I did for\nAMSAT and hold no grudges on making it better.  If you can come up with a\nbetter design with some of the stuff that is out there, Go For IT!!!\n\nBest Regards\n\n\nCharles,\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}