Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RQ4IZ3HKGHNXWGOFT4RTKLYBWHUPLNV4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "RQ4IZ3HKGHNXWGOFT4RTKLYBWHUPLNV4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MH45X5HHNVLXO5H7OCHAKAP7F5CZOU7K/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "jking (a) eclipticenterprises.com",
        "mailman_id": "70cd8619cfc94c8aa65d95c362f04c86",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/70cd8619cfc94c8aa65d95c362f04c86/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jan A. King",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Baa ba little lamb.",
    "date": "2007-09-07T09:11:55Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MH45X5HHNVLXO5H7OCHAKAP7F5CZOU7K/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DK43M6E7WXQ4LT6KVBCYHL53WCHSM5TA/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "John,\nAre you sure it's not because there is now some eclipse time that is taking\nthe bird down?  It only takes a few seconds without a battery and the timer\nwill be reset or come up random (I think it resets, as I recall).  The way\nthe orbit of the Earth around the sun works, the minimum eclipse duration\nfor sun sync orbits should be on about February 10 and the maximum eclipse\nshould be on about June 1.  The orbit has drifted so far in the sunward\ndirection (toward a 6 AM - 6 PM ascending node) that there may be no eclipse\nat all now (which is good) but, you would expect to have this problem you\nare describing more like in June than in September if it is due to eclipse.\nCurious!  I suppose the timer could have failed but, it's funny to think\nthat it would fail after 31 years and other stuff would not have.  There is\nnothing special about those two CMOS gates that would make that circuit any\nmore prone to failure than any other that is still working.  I'd rather\nsuspect something with the power system driven by orbit changes.  One power\nglitch would reset the timer.\nJan\n \n  _____  \n\nFrom: John Hackett [mailto:[email protected]] \nSent: Thursday, 6 September 2007 9:00 AM\nTo: [email protected]\nCc: [email protected]; [email protected];\[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]\nSubject: Baa ba little lamb.\n \nSo much for the (convenient) 24 hours timer theory proffered in response to\nmy previous mails regarding the timing of AO-7.\n \nThis is the 3rd consequtive day the 24 hour timer is *NOT* playing ball.\n \n05/06 Septembert 2007.\n\nTIME.  ORBIT.  MODE.\n\n23:46  50133    B\n23:51  50133    A\n01:35  50135    A\n01:36  50134    B\n01:44  40135    A\n\nI have received confirmation mails from AJ9K and K3SZH that \ntheir log entries *ARE* correct.\n\nAs you Gentlemen on that side of the pond are wont to say ... \n\"go figure!\".\n\nIncidentally, the mode changes spell \"baa ba\" ... it couldn't be that AO-t\nthinks we're a veritable bunch (flock) of sheep?.\n\nJust a thought.  \n\n73 John.   <[email protected]>\n",
    "attachments": []
}