Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RZGTLMG5YN6APY5LCF466INXA7QLALQM/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "RZGTLMG5YN6APY5LCF466INXA7QLALQM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RZGTLMG5YN6APY5LCF466INXA7QLALQM/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k5knt.kent (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Kent Frazier",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  \"Mobile\" Operation",
    "date": "2009-03-17T11:41:04Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DA33LKURZYLG2WP5AHFT2KOCLN63PTUC/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I've heard conflicting things, so I'd like to see what the consensus is\nhere.\n\nSince my rig is mounted in my car, I've been told I should say \"mobile\" when\never I attempt a QSO. Some of the reasoning is that others will understand\nmy \"limitations\" and try to work me. On occasion, this seems to have been\nthe case.\n\nOthers have told me that I should only use \"mobile\" when the vehicle is\nactually in motion.\n\nWhat say you all?\n\n\n73, Kent K5KNT\nAMSAT #36765\nARRL\n",
    "attachments": []
}