Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/S2HJVSMBKBMTAOP2433KDHWQ5UYUBAX7/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAD+wY0tN-iG3GYyKTW4o-drWBi7bUrKP3Dw5LpeaHZrEh-uMfQ@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "S2HJVSMBKBMTAOP2433KDHWQ5UYUBAX7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NDBWCLHYNPLKYXF5O6LKMA7KWHIX34OY/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mr.soup12 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Oliver",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Icon ID-51A for satellite",
    "date": "2016-01-22T01:22:54Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q3LYRRHEPQFF3VJESJ4E3GMSB6IXFS4N/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DMLPT5HZR5TFGCBQKK3NZRBJHPWIOFAM/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I already own a set of baofengs and an arrow antenna .  I split the rx/tx.\n\nShould I be utilizing a duplexer on the receive regardless of this fact?\n\nThank you to all who have commented so far.  You have presented additional\nthings to consider that I would not have known otherwise.\nOn Jan 21, 2016 6:00 PM, \"Fernando Ramirez\" <[email protected]>\nwrote:\n\n> Or, he can use the ID51A to receive and the Baofeng to transmit. He can\n> use an Arrow with the diplexer or buy a Comet one.\n>\n> Cheaper solution than the Kenwood HT.\n>\n> 73\n> Fernando, NP4JV\n> On Jan 21, 2016 4:56 PM, \"Bob\" <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n>> Hi Oliver,\n>>\n>> An optimal choice would be a full-duplex HT, one that can receive on one\n>> band and transmit on another at the same time.  The 51A won't do that.\n>>\n>> Check out this discussion:\n>>\n>> http://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/trying-to-get-answers-on-full-duplex-ht-for-satellite.484629/\n>>\n>> And specific to the 51A:\n>> http://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/icom-id-51a.441780/\n>>\n>> The Kenwood TH-D72A supports full duplex (also called cross-band repeat),\n>> for example.\n>>\n>> From work-sat.com: \"Although it is preferable to work the FM sats in\n>> full-duplex mode (where you can hear the downlink as you key your mic),\n>> only one currently-manufactured HT does that well in our VHF/UHF mode\n>> - the Kenwood\n>> TH-D72a. \"\n>>\n>> 73, Bob, WB4SON\n>>\n>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Oliver <[email protected]> wrote:\n>>\n>> > Considering purchasing an icom.  Can anyone comment on using the 51A vs\n>> a\n>> > baofeng?  Particularly how sensitivity compares.\n>> >\n>> > Thanks and 73\n>> > KD9CFO\n>> > _______________________________________________\n>> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>> Opinions\n>> > expressed\n>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>> > AMSAT-NA.\n>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>> program!\n>> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>> >\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>> Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>> AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}