Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/S4Q4ADQWY2CPNAERNU3ZXDAWO66PFRAU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "S4Q4ADQWY2CPNAERNU3ZXDAWO66PFRAU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/L2RQ37XF6J3F542URPAHHUIXERQT6BFB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gary_mayfield (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: K5D an embarrassment / poor operating procedure.",
    "date": "2009-02-25T04:08:40Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QE6DQCEKISPRX3XVYTW4ROYBMRQVAXS3/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "You use the phonetics that work.  If your call gets busted the same way on a\nregular basis it is time to change things up.  My call is kk0sd.  When I say\nkilo kilo zero sierra delta, the station always comes back k0sd when I say\nkilowatt kilowatt zero sierra delta they get it right every time.\n\n73,\n\nJoe kk0sd\n\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604\nSent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:38 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: K5D an embarrassment / poor operating procedure.\n\nThe NATO/ITU phonetics aren't perfect.  The \"DXer's\" phonetics (mostly\nplace names) are a reasonable alternative, but only the two sets\nshould be used.  When I'm working 'phone, when I've got it together, I\ntry to repeat back using the other set.  And I hate Kilowatt, too- I\nalways hear that as \"KW\".\n\n73, doug\n\n   Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:21:47 -0600\n   From: Sean Cavanaugh <[email protected]>\n\n   Darin Cowan wrote:\n   > W9VNE said:\n   >>> Unfortunately the operation of AO 51 is a large embarrassment. I \n   >>> have never in 56 years of operating ever seen demonstrated such \n   >>> poor operating procedures.\n   > \n   > I'd be happy if people would just use the proper phonetic alphabet.  So\nmany\n   > logs have been messed up by \"kilowatt\" which is KW to me, as opposed to\nthe\n   > correct \"kilo\" and the other bizarre appellations of letters.  And it's\nnot\n   > just on satellites that this is a problem.  When I hear something like\n   > \"Kilowatt Capacitor Eight United Airlines\" (made up example, if you are\n   > KC8UAL, I'm not picking on you or accusing you) I can pretty much\nguarantee\n   > it won't end up correct in the logs.  That makes it a non-QSO and a\nwaste of\n   > time for both ends.\n   > \n   > Combine proper phonetic use with \"listen before transmitting\" and 90%\nor\n   > better of the issues we see would go away.\n\n   I am often guilty of not using the correct phonetics, but I do have a \n   reason. 95% of the time, if the other station has marginal reception, \n   they come back as VE5, not VA5. I think it's just the other ops' brain \n   filling in the blanks with what they expect to hear, so I will correct \n   as \"Victor America 5\" and it usually seems to solve that problem. I do \n   try to stick with the ITU phonetics 99% of the time though.\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}