Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/S62KEKSZIRTG7I5C3EAF25WS66XDX23J/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "S62KEKSZIRTG7I5C3EAF25WS66XDX23J",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7I3D5KTJRCLUSIEJUCZRICC56YWF6ZY7/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "karn (a) philkarn.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Phil Karn",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Turn off AGC when receiving BPSK-1000",
    "date": "2011-08-21T02:10:54Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CWYR6F6Q3WJI7467OO4EPXF2IM24LOML/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IL224OVMS7ASTJ5SA5KBT324EQKLK2FL/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 8/19/11 7:51 AM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:\n\n> What kind of digital are you suggesting?  Voice and data both?  A\n> digital path from anywhere on the planet to the appropriate ground\n> station is easily doable with some \"documentation\" of the ground stations.\n\nDigital voice would be the easiest to support since the data rate is so\nmodest. Low rate data (< 100 kb/s) wouldn't be much harder. All it takes\nis a stabilized platform with microwave antennas. Any ground station\nwith an Internet connection could automatically link with the ISS and\nrelay it to a central point (e.g., Houston) and then hand it off to the\nnext ground station. One advantage we hams have always had over NASA\nitself are our numbers and geographical distribution. We obviously\nwouldn't be able to cover the large parts of the earth that are entirely\nwater but we could still do a pretty good job with the rest.\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}