Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SAJZLDZBWWOC4LYFEU5WMKF52SHXS35I/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "SAJZLDZBWWOC4LYFEU5WMKF52SHXS35I",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/VOPYRXKCOFH44ZBKTWNXFK76FCOHYRSQ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "framirezferrer (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "c2908a290d05444880cc2d23923afcdb",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/c2908a290d05444880cc2d23923afcdb/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Fernando Ramirez",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] AO-85 & HT",
    "date": "2016-05-30T19:48:47Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ENCTEIRWM7YABXBMZRBD4XLMUGCDBB32/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "For me working AO-85 while QRP is all about the challenge. Of course, it is way easier for me to work that satellite with 50 watts from a mobile rig, but my most memorable QSOs on AO-85 (and SO-50) were achieved using only a handheld antenna and a 4 watts handheld. \n\n>From southern Arizona, I have worked as far as Alaska, Yukon Territory, Curacao on SO-50 (that last one not easy from the Southwest) and Guadaloupe Island on AO-85. My AO-85, 5,282km QSO with FG8OJ was completed on a 2 degrees pass using an UV-B5/FT-817nd and Arrow antenna. \n\nIt takes planning, practice, but above all, patience and perseverance!\n\n73\nFernando, NP4JV\n\n\n\nSent from Mail for Windows 10\n\nFrom: Dave Webb KB1PVH\nSent: Monday, May 30, 2016 11:38 AM\nTo: AMSAT -BB\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-85 & HT\n\nJohn,\n\nI'm guessing not everyone has a radio like an FT-847 but they have an HT or\n2. It's also easier to carry an HT outside vs. an 847.\n\nDave-KB1PVH\n\nSent from my Samsung S4\nOn May 30, 2016 2:32 PM, \"John Becker\" <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Is there a reason for using a HT and not a desk top rig such as FT847?\n>\n> John\n>\n>\n> On 5/30/2016 12:26 PM, Kevin Ehm wrote:\n>\n>> I’m having great difficulty hitting and receiving AO-85 with my Yaesu VX\n>> 6r.  I have read about the frequencies, and that I’m not alone in the boat\n>> with HT’s and only 5 watts.  I’m in BP51, and used to hit the easy ones\n>> when they were working.  Am I simply wasting my time with AO-85?\n>>\n>>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}