Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SC7ZT77QWG7Z6LQWDOFET3PMARVMYH6N/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "SC7ZT77QWG7Z6LQWDOFET3PMARVMYH6N",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Z6G6KJ7TQ3NMHRY5YOQPOX5BXIKA4BMZ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "racer5039 (a) q.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "racer",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Wish List, The Ideal VHF/UHF Sat Rig",
    "date": "2010-03-01T20:51:15Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SF3BFXOWUB5VVGG4XFAYO75ZJGK4FV7W/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I'm been thinking about this type of radio also.\nMy wish list (being a Kenwood guy) would be, take the case of the 480 HX \nload it with 2M ,440, and maybe 1.2G all mode.\nI'm no radio builder but I would think that using the case and head wouldn't \nbe that hard.\nI'd really like to see something other than the ts-2000 that would run the \nsats.\n\nN0FJP\n\n\n--------------------------------------------------\nFrom: \"Fabio Roccatagliata\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Monday, March 01, 2010 02:30 PM\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Wish List, The Ideal VHF/UHF Sat Rig\n\n> Dear friends,\n>\n> I agree with the 100W power requirement I completely agree with WF1F about\n> not including the 28Mhz.\n>\n> I was wondering what about an SDR approach. Until now I just saw hf SDR\n> radios but if it would be possible to use SDR technology most of the\n> requirements would be satisfied and, quite sure, with lower costs and \n> giving\n> us the chance to customize much more easily such features.\n>\n> An SDR approach would also give to not major hamradio companies a chance \n> to\n> be more competitive on the market = more chances to get from them what we\n> want\n>\n> Regards\n> Fabio\n> IZ1EGT / F5VKV\n>\n> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:12 PM, MM <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n>> Hi John,\n>>\n>> My concern with adding 10 meters to a competition class VHF/UHF high end\n>> satellite rig, is that the rig will turn into another mediocre HF rig \n>> with\n>> VHF/UHF added on.\n>>\n>> If we do start building Mode-A  satellites in the future, then we can\n>> always use Two radios, a dedicated HF and a High performance Sat rig.\n>>\n>> The primary goal is to have the engineers put all the money into a kick \n>> but\n>> 6/2/440 transceiver.\n>>\n>> Thank you very much for your comments.\n>>\n>> WF1F\n>>\n>>\n>> --- On Mon, 3/1/10, John Geiger <[email protected]> wrote:\n>>\n>> > From: John Geiger <[email protected]>\n>> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Wish List, The Ideal VHF/UHF Sat Rig\n>> > To: \"Mark L. Hammond\" <[email protected]>, \"Andrew Glasbrenner\" <\n>> [email protected]>\n>> > Cc: [email protected]\n>> > Date: Monday, March 1, 2010, 2:32 PM\n>> >\n>> >\n>> > --- On Mon, 3/1/10, Andrew Glasbrenner <[email protected]>\n>> > wrote:\n>> >\n>> > > >> No access to frequencies below 50\n>> > megacycles.\n>> > > >>\n>> > > Many serious 6m ops listen to utilities below 50Mhz to\n>> > tell\n>> > > when the\n>> > > banding is close to opening.\n>> >\n>> >\n>> > You also need 10m for Mode A.  I'm still hoping that\n>> > RS12/13 pops back to life like AO7 and will have its Mode T\n>> > going again. That was alot of fun.\n>> >\n>> > 73s John AA5JG\n>> >\n>> >\n>> >\n>> >\n>> >\n>> > _______________________________________________\n>> > Sent via [email protected].\n>> > Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur\n>> > satellite program!\n>> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>> >\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n",
    "attachments": []
}