Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SI474EGAS7OZHU4U4Z3LHGFIYKZFLJOI/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "SI474EGAS7OZHU4U4Z3LHGFIYKZFLJOI",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GVN4MK2YHNPVSMKWXVQQPTOG7BMQJD7S/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ai6do (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Ryan Noguchi",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] NO84 in safe mode",
    "date": "2019-06-11T18:13:00Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5K76WXCT2CMREN6NMR7Y23XWAFWW2HFS/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": " To be fair, my experience is only with the RSP1A, which is two years (two generations!) newer than the RSP1 that Scott uses. If you're looking to inexpensively add a receiver to a transmitting radio for a full duplex satellite system, the $120 RSP1A is a very serviceable option and much cheaper than a transceiver. I don't think the RSP1 is available new any longer. \n\nYou're right in that in certain portions of amateur radio, the equipment is evolving very quickly; in other areas, very glacially. I bought a new FT-818ND last year, which is not really a substantive improvement over the FT-817ND, which has been around for fifteen years. I use it exclusively as a transmitter for linear satellite work, and it works well in that role, as would your FT-817. \n\n\n73, Ryan AI6DO\n\n\n    On Tuesday, June 11, 2019, 6:29:05 AM PDT, Phil via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> wrote:  \n \n On 11/6/19 12:44 pm, Ryan Noguchi via AMSAT-BB wrote:\n>  In my uncalibrated-ear testing with an A/B switch on satellite downlinks, I found my RSP1A is noticeably more sensitive (with HDSDR driving it) than the FT-857D, FT-818ND,\n\nThank you Ryan and Scott for your replies. I'm surprised that the RSP1 \nis more sensitive than the FT-817, which I bought when they first became \navailable.\n\nI've been away from Amateur Radio for quite some time and I feel that \nadvances in the field are passing me by.\n\n-- \n\nRegards,\nPhil\n  \n",
    "attachments": []
}