Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SOGMO4EZR3THPSB6H53MIMZM6YRV2SQW/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "007201c825a0$2b4757b0$6501a8c0@W5YI",
    "message_id_hash": "SOGMO4EZR3THPSB6H53MIMZM6YRV2SQW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZUII7BUVTTSDXWLH2WBG63SHLU33X4PY/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "snyderb (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: TNC Reccomendation",
    "date": "2007-11-13T02:52:02Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZUII7BUVTTSDXWLH2WBG63SHLU33X4PY/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "John\n\n  I have 4 different brand name TNC's I use to cover 1200, 9600 & 38k4 baud \nranges. For 1200/9600 my PK96 works the best for me as the data rates are \neasily software changeable, no dip switches or jumpers to worry about. I \nhave a KPC-9612+ which works well but requires 2 different data cables to \nwork 1200 & 9600 with my IC910 rig. I found I had to make some specific \ninternal software settings to get it to continuously work right.\n  As with any TNC you have to have the right data cable / cables that match \nyour TNC to rig.\n\n73 Bruce KG4YEV\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"John Henderson\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:07 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] TNC Reccomendation\n\n\n>I would like to get into the digital sats and would like some ideas on TNC\n> to consider. I looked at the MFJ web site but it appears they have\n> discontinued many of their models. Also looking KAM but have no idea which\n> one to pick. Appears major deltas are baud rates 1200 vs 9600.\n>\n> Thanks for any ideas or things to consider.\n>\n>\n>\n>           John\n>\n>          John Henderson N4NAB\n>\n>          212 Bayside Drive\n>\n>          Cape Carteret, NC 28584\n>\n>            252-725-2744\n>\n>            <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]\n>\n>        <http://www.amsat.org/> http://www.amsat.org/\n>\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}