Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SOZKL52LZC3K5GDI45MUNXPAURPDV7FO/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "SOZKL52LZC3K5GDI45MUNXPAURPDV7FO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/R5A74XCPKHEHGLBDRJOKR6MIEXPP6KDA/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kk5do (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)",
    "date": "2018-06-25T16:53:15Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TUDGWRMN7S67NCUDBBH5AL6E44E23NMJ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DZ7FQXSTULHP3LY33A5SBOXEWCMB6PYZ/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N4Y2IN6B7MT4X7X55NI6BMWFI6BQOIRB/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "In the AMSAT rules we do state, because someone asked about it, you can be a net control type station and work every station you want. You would only be able to score one contact yourself but had given many out to those trying to make the 100 point satellite bonus.  \n\nWe still feel by limiting to one FM contact that if you worked someone and both of you leave the bird, two more stations can work each other thereby maximazing the number of possible contacts on the satellite during a single pass. \n\n73...bruce\n\nSent from my iPhone\n\nOn Jun 25, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) <[email protected]> wrote:\n\nHi Dave!\n\nThanks again for the SO-50 QSO on Saturday morning early in\nField Day. Even with a pass starting to the south, with most\nof the footprint over Mexico and the Pacific at that point,\nit wasn't an easy QSO to make. Like you, I played my MP3\nrecording back a couple of times to make sure I copied your\ninformation. It was there, and the QSO went in the log.\n\nAfter I worked you, I worked two other stations that called -\nRon W5RKN in Texas, followed by W6KA operated by Tom WA0POD.\nAs I prepare my log for both ARRL and AMSAT, these two QSOs\nwon't go in my score. I will also have some non-scoring QSOs\non the western AO-91 pass just over an hour later - I worked\nKB6LTY very early in that pass, then K6FW and K5RWK (this was\nthe QSO for their 100-point bonus) before that pass simply\nbecame unworkable due to the number of high-power signals\nslamming the satellite. I had exactly one QSO on the AO-85\npass just after 0100 UTC Saturday evening, so I don't have\nto worry about the 1-QSO rule there.\n\nI have logged multiple QSOs on FM satellites during Field Days\nin the past, and I don't count them in my score. I list them\non the submissions I make to ARRL and AMSAT. In the several\nyears I have done this, I have never seen any objections to\nthis come from either entity. I am choosing to make non-scoring\nQSOs, instead of - for example - going back to 20m or 40m and\nmaking QSOs for points for ARRL Field Day on those bands.\n\nAs for the general theme of many messages on here since the\nend of Field Day, I guess it wouldn't be a Field Day among\nsatellite operators without all the hand-wringing about the\nsituation on the FM satellites. I'm not sure I heard \"lots\" of\nQSOs on any of the V/U or U/V FM satellites - I heard some,\nbut heard more CQing, \"QRZ\", or on one AO-85 pass a station\nIDing so often it was basically a CQ call without saying CQ.\nWere there QSOs being made into Saturday night and into\nSunday morning? I didn't hear many QSOs on the western AO-92\npass yesterday, just before 1800 UTC, that I heard from home.\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}