Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SPOPZVLRRC2V5LGUUDBT3NOJMFTPFRQ4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "SPOPZVLRRC2V5LGUUDBT3NOJMFTPFRQ4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ANTF3MIO5A4XM7HKF4E2LNCLLNNKRWNH/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: A0-51 \"easy sat\" not so easy for QRPers",
    "date": "2008-02-26T00:13:45Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HVOYDM223774RB2T3UKQSCUSREWZGL4V/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 10:26 AM 2/26/2008, Mark VandeWettering wrote:\n\n>I mostly agree with this, there are some calls which\n>are rather difficult to pull apart sometimes, and often\n>just the fact that you are slowing down to say them\n>phonetically helps.\n\nVery much so. :)\n\n\n>But perhaps this is a good time to introduce a little personal\n>rant of mine.   First of all, I work satellites exclusively\n>QRP with a TH-D7A and an arrow antenna (no preamp).\n>This is a fun way for me to work, and I enjoy it a great\n>deal, and quite frankly, with some ear buds I can hear\n>the satellite very well, and always get good strong signal\n>reports above 10 degrees or so, which is pretty much\n\nI normally work the birds with a similar setup, and have no \ndifficulty receiving it.  In the past, I used around 1W to access the \nuplink with little difficulty.\n\n>That's what makes the following particularly frustrating:\n>someone with a LOT more power than me simply comes\n>on and blasts over my QSO.  Well, that's just the half of\n\nThat's common, and the cause (at least down here) is invariably a \nnewbie trying to work the bird using a high gain vertical and no \npreamp (For the newcomers out there, this DOESN'T WORK!!!  Best to \ntry working it with a HT, seriously).\n\n>Yes, I understand there can be fading and the like, but\n>once the satellite is above even ten degrees, I pretty\n>much always get full quieting from AO-51.   I keep wondering\n\nI do too.\n\n>why people with presumably much larger stations have\n>so much more difficulty hearing the bird.   I'm left with\n>equally puzzling alternatives: that people running much\n>more power than I simply don't have sufficient receive\n>gain to hear the satellite, or that they simply don't care\n>whether they interrupt existing communications and just\n>key up over people.\n\nOne of the things I hate about V/U is there is a 20 ish dB disparity \nin the uplink/downlink power budgets, and that is in favour of the \nuplink.  U/V is roughly balanced.  The former creates all sorts of \nopportunities for alligators...\n\n>of your station before clogging the satellite.  The maxim\n>\"you got to hear 'em to work 'em\" should be the motto\n>of every satellite operator.\n\nTrue, ESPECIALLY for satellites.  If you can't hear it, fix your station! :)\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}