Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/STI5S2ZUJ62ICZF4OIZEODAUOHQDCXWK/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "C4E0E574C85C4035A487814E46EE5244@MikeClone",
    "message_id_hash": "STI5S2ZUJ62ICZF4OIZEODAUOHQDCXWK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/STI5S2ZUJ62ICZF4OIZEODAUOHQDCXWK/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mryan301 (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "bd66675a3fd2449d9a39d8aa56f5d5af",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bd66675a3fd2449d9a39d8aa56f5d5af/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Mike Ryan",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Re: Quadrifilar Helix antenna question",
    "date": "2012-01-23T22:15:26Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "QFH are a bear to build, especially on 70 cm unless you’re very , very skilled. I tried 3 times and failed 3 times. Finally gave up and went with a standard turnstyle. Still critical tolerances but much easier to make and works lower on the horizon than the QFH. QHtenna used to sell turnstiles (reviewed in QST)  but I think they are out of business now. You might also want to consider a moxon. Cebik wrote a nice article on making a moxon based turnstile.   I built one for 70 cm using PVC and like the QFH and eggbeater (with reflector) , it works best on higher passes.  \n\nIf you run out of patience, you might consider the Antennas.us QFH. It was also reviewed positively in QST but I don’t own one.\n\nAnd lastly, omnis are small and simple, but you really need a preamp to avoid a terminal case of frustration. I use the ones from ARR with good results.\n\n\nMike\n",
    "attachments": []
}