Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SV7MCY6SVVMPOENCYYIYMIOP6CT4LH2S/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SV7MCY6SVVMPOENCYYIYMIOP6CT4LH2S/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAPFr_UkXyEXkKxZRAb7pNqxKPdzz=FrE-v5f6hTvNwSj_bj=tg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "SV7MCY6SVVMPOENCYYIYMIOP6CT4LH2S",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/XYE2MTAIMRTNJ4N2YVVHGLHUDE3SISAD/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ki7unj (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "f58ccbb5b72e45929dff11e19efa4b84",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/f58ccbb5b72e45929dff11e19efa4b84/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "KI7UNJ Tucker",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] RS-44 on LOTW?",
    "date": "2020-05-13T23:30:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XYE2MTAIMRTNJ4N2YVVHGLHUDE3SISAD/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Bernie,\n\nGlad to see that It all worked out for you.\n\n73\n\nOn Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:27 PM Bernie and Cheryl <[email protected]>\nwrote:\n\n> Thanks to everyone who replied.  And yes, Tucker, I am using HRD for my\n> logging, and therein lay my problem.\n>\n> Here's what the problem was.  I originally had a problem uploading RS-44\n> QSO's to LOTW.  Several here on the list replied to my original post and\n> suggested that my version of TQSL might be outdated.  So, I downloaded\n> Version 2.5.3.  This resulted in a situation where NO QSO's could be\n> uploaded, including non-satellite contacts, such as HF contacts.\n>\n> Tucker's question about using HRD (aka, Ham Radio Deluxe, of which I am\n> using the latest version, i.e, V6.7.0.277) and his link to the HRD blog\n> sent me off in the right direction.  It turned out that the \"Station\n> Location\" data I had first input into HRD included the use of the word\n> \"Colorado\" rather than the postal abbreviation of \"CO\".  TQSL now\n> interprets the use of the full spelling of a state, as opposed to its\n> postal abbreviation as an \"error\", and won't allow the log entry to be\n> uploaded.  Once I changed the home state field in my HRD program, I went\n> out and worked someone and was able to upload that new QSO to LOTW\n> immediately.\n>\n> But, what about my old QSO's that I hadn't uploaded yet?  It turns out\n> that BOTH states need to use the postal abbreviation.  In other words, not\n> only does the entry for the state of my station need to use the postal\n> abbreviation, but now the state of the station I am working needs to be\n> changed to use the postal abbreviation.  If this is not done both ways, the\n> QSO can't be uploaded.  So, I went back to my RS-44 QSO's, and had to\n> change a few QSO's to the respective postal abbreviations (there were only\n> about 3-4 our out of 19 QSO's like this, and yet none of them could be\n> uploaded in the same attempt).  After doing that, all of my RS-44 QSOs were\n> uploaded to LOTW without a problem.\n>\n> I'm not sure that what the programmers for TQSL did was an improvement.\n> But, I can testify to the fact that I learned a great lesson in patience,\n> so maybe that was the whole point???  I hate software updates!\n>\n> Thanks to Tucker, KI7UNJ, and the rest of you for your helpful replies.\n> See you on the birds!\n>\n> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS\n> On 5/12/2020 7:29 AM, KI7UNJ Tucker wrote:\n>\n> You using HRD by chance for your logging?\n>\n> Here is a post from my local club about HRD And the new version of TQSL\n>\n> **************\n> It turns out that you are right, the problem appears to be in the Log file\n> created by HAM Radio Deluxe. This article tells us how to fix it:\n> https://www.hamradiodeluxe.com/blog/TQSL\n> -v252-TipsnTricks-for-Correcting-Your-Log-Data.html\n>\n> Rick Murphy provided that pointer:\n> https://groups.arrl.org/g/ARRL-LoTW/message/32757?p=,,,20,0,0,0\n> *****************\n>\n> https://groups.arrl.org\n> <https://groups.arrl.org/g/ARRL-LoTW/message/32757?p=,,,20,0,0,0>On Tue,\n> May 12, 2020 at 06:22 KI7UNJ Tucker <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n>> Good morning\n>>\n>> For the BB when you want to respond do a “reply all” that will reply to\n>> both the person whom responded and back to the BB. now if that person only\n>> did a reply to you and not to the BB you can add the BB email on the to\n>> list with there name if you want the response to go to the BB.\n>>\n>> As for TQSL... I assume your using a logging software and it’s sending\n>> the data to TQSL?  If so TQSL changed a bit in what it expects in the log 2\n>> versions ago and many logging apps need to be updated. I’ll try and find\n>> the post about it and forward it to you.\n>>\n>>\n>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 22:15 Bernie and Cheryl <[email protected]>\n>> wrote:\n>>\n>>> Hi Tucker:\n>>>\n>>> We've worked on the birds several times.  Indeed, I believe we've\n>>> exchanged QSL's.\n>>>\n>>> I have a couple of questions if you don't mind.  First, I downloaded the\n>>> newest version of TQSL.  Now, it refuses to upload *any *contacts.  I\n>>> get the following screen when I try to upload:  \"Failed to sign the ADIF\n>>> with TQSL, see logfile for more info.\"  Do you know what the problem is?\n>>>\n>>> Secondly, so that I don't have to pester you with every question, how do\n>>> I respond to a post on the AMSAT board so that the whole board can read\n>>> it?  Obviously, I can respond to individuals who replied to my original\n>>> post using direct email (at least I know how to do original posts), but I\n>>> don't know how to respond on the board itself.\n>>>\n>>> Thanks, and hope to see you on the birds soon.\n>>>\n>>> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS\n>>> On 5/10/2020 1:44 PM, KI7UNJ Tucker wrote:\n>>>\n>>> RS-44 is in LOTW,  I have multiple QSL in LTOW from it.  You will need\n>>> to update your TQSL (came out May 1st) with the latest config. and make\n>>> sure you have sat = \"RS-44\"\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:53 AM Bernie and Cheryl via AMSAT-BB <\n>>> [email protected]> wrote:\n>>>\n>>>> Dear Folks:\n>>>>\n>>>> I have been uploading my QSO's to LOTW fairly quickly.  I have noticed\n>>>> that none of my RS-44 QSOs show up.  Is this happening for everyone?\n>>>> If\n>>>> not, what am I doing wrong?\n>>>>\n>>>> Thanks, in advance, for any help you can give me.\n>>>>\n>>>> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS\n>>>>\n>>>> _______________________________________________\n>>>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>>>> Opinions expressed\n>>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views\n>>>> of AMSAT-NA.\n>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>>>> program!\n>>>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> --\n>>> *Casey Tucker  KI7UNJ*\n>>> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ\n>>>\n>>> --\n>> *Casey Tucker  KI7UNJ*\n>> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ\n>>\n>> --\n> *Casey Tucker  KI7UNJ*\n> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ\n>\n>\n\n-- \n*Casey Tucker  KI7UNJ*\nhttps://twitter.com/KI7UNJ\n",
    "attachments": []
}